More Americans favor war

| 4 Comments | No TrackBacks

It seems I was right after all when I predicted that President Xanex's news conference last week would shift public opinion. At the time, I foresaw a shift of between 5 and 7 percentage points in favor of war. Well, according to a New York Times/CBS poll conducted March 7 to 9, 44 percent of respondents said the United States should act against Iraq "soon" compared to 36 percent two weeks ago -- right in line with my 5-7 percentage points, given the poll's margin of error. On the brighter side, however, a majority -- 52 percent -- of respondents want to continue to give weapons inspectors more time. On the other hand, that number is down from 62 percent two weeks ago, indicating an erosion of confidence in the inspection regime.

poll-results.jpgAs far as Bush making the case for attacking Iraq, the numbers haven't budged since the last poll conducted March 4-5, with 52 percent saying the president has presented enough evidence and 43 percent saying he hasn't. Previous results were 53 percent and 42 percent, respectively.

Encouragingly, 60 percent of respondents want the United States to take the views of its allies -- both of them -- into account, compared to 36 percent who want the United States to act unilaterally. When it comes to the Security Council and possible vetoes from France, Russia or China, however, the numbers are much closer, with 44 percent saying America should act anyway and 49 percent saying America should take the veto(es) into account, results that fall within the margin of error. Confusingly, though, a solid 55 percent approved of the U.S. taking action even if the Security Council nixes the latest resolution setting a March 17 deadline for Iraq to produce evidence of disarmament. Forty-one percent would disapprove of military action, indicating that a majority of Americans are confused on what the word "veto" means.

Over all, 66 percent to 30 percent favor using military action to remove Saddam Hussein from power.

Interestingly, 51 percent of respondents think Bush is more interested in removing Saddam from power than in ridding Iraq of weapons of mass destruction (26 percent.) At the same time, 40 percent of respondents were personally interested in rooting out WMD and 34 percent were personally interested in removing Saddam.

The respondents indicate the public is split on Bush's motivations, with 48 percent saying this war is driven by a personal desire to finish his father's business and 46 percent saying personal desires are not involved. Perhaps most tellingly, however, is that 62 percent of respondents don't think the administration is telling the public what it needs to know about its reasons for attacking Iraq, and 33 percent think the administration is the model of loquaciousness.

And finally, almost half -- 45 percent -- believe Saddam Hussein was personally involved in the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on New York City and Washington, D.C.

The poll was conducted via telephone among 1,010 adults with a 95 percent confidence and a 3 point margin of error.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.back-to-iraq.com/blog-mt/mt-tb.cgi/2493

4 Comments

Boy, what a kicker. 45% think Saddam was into 9/11. If I were so misinformed, I’d be unequivocally for icing the creep. So we have to think most of those semiconscious opinion holders are on the attack now side.

I know… What a depressing statistic to come across.

Hmm 45% think that Saddam Hussein was involved in 9/11?

Well take a look at..

http://pollingreport.com/vietnam.htm (the second last question)

:)

It seems that Herr Hermann Goering was right. If you repeat a lie enough people will start to believe it.

Klaatu

About me


Hi there! Thanks for stopping in. I'm Christopher Allbritton, former AP and New York Daily News reporter. In 2002, I went stumbling around Iraqi Kurdistan, the northern part of Iraq outside Saddam's direct control, looking for stories. (Some might call it "looking for trouble.") In March 2003, I made it back in time for the war, becoming the Web's first fully reader-funded journalist-blogger. With the support of thousands of readers, we raised almost $15,000. You can read my dispatches here. It was one of the moments in journalism when everything worked. It was a grand -- and successful -- experiment in independent journalism. In 2004, I moved to Iraq, where I would spend the next two years. It was a raucous, scary and exciting place with a lot of news going on. But I've since moved on to Beirut and the wider region. I now report for a variety of outlets.

Clips
Résumé
Email
AOL IM me

Donate

Won't you consider donating to support reportage from the Middle East? Your generosity directly feeds reporting costs such as visas, travel, fees and other expenses. I already have a bullet-proof vest, so no need to fund that.

Media Availability

If you'd like to book me for radio or TV appearances -- I'm experienced in both -- please contact my agency, Global Radio News, at + (0) 44 20 7976 5335. Thank you.

Technorati

Technorati search

» Blogs that link here

November 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

Archives

Creative Commons License
This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by Movable Type 4.21-en