In a post on alphabet city, Robert brings up the idea that Jaysh al-Muhammad, which was involved in the planning of the Palestine Hotel attack on Monday, was founded by Saddam Hussein right before the war. He's sorta right, but there are more details. As usual, it's more complicated than just saying it's a creation of Saddam.
Just after the war, Saddam instructed his subordinates to "rebuild your networks." These networks became the core of the insurgency that included Jaysh al-Muhammad. The majority of JAM's members are former military men who, by definition, were members of the Ba'ath Party, but that does not mean they subscribe fully to the Ba'athist ideology or that they follow Saddam. They are generally more nationalistic than Ba'athist, but their ideology is a complicated mishmash of Iraqi nationalism and pan-Arabism. (The latter is a plank of Ba'athist ideology, though.) The JAM also attracts money and support from former regime elements and exiles in Syria and Jordan because of a) its relative effectiveness and b) its surface Ba'athist trappings.
How do the jihadis such as Zarqawi fit into this? While Zarqawi was present in Iraq prior to the war, he was confined to the Kurdish area in the north and was working with Ansar al-Islam, a group mainly made up of Kurdish salafists and some veterans of Afghanistan. It was only after the Ba'athist and nationalist insurgency began to make some gains that they were able to get into the fight. They established a great deal of momentum and have been riding it ever since, struggling for control of "the insurgency" against the Ba'athists and nationalists.
The weapons in this internecine struggle are money and appeals to religion. While the Ba'athists can command great sums of cash through old accounts in Syria, Jordan and elsewhere, the jihadis can call on equal funds from the oil-rich sympathizers in the Gulf states. (I'm talking individuals, not necessarily government support -- but I wouldn't rule it out, either.)
The jihadis gain influence within the insurgency by initially providing money and materiel to smaller nationalist groups, but then start lobbying for their new-found beneficiaries to starting being better Muslims. More help, more preaching follows, and soon enough, a group of nationalists have grown their beards, stopped drinking beer and smoking cigarettes and start praying five times a day. What they may have originally seen as a struggle of national resistance has become jihad, with the original leaders of the nationalist group either eliminated or pushed aside in favor of more religious-minded men.
This fight over nationalism/secularism and jihad/fundamentalism is happening all over Iraq, not just in the insurgency. It's happening in the society at large and within the Iraqi government. It's also happening all over the Muslim world, and in many ways is the real war on "terror."



so, would that mean that now is the best time/last best chance for us to get out of iraq, while the secularists still have the strength and opportunity to displace the religiofanatics? or do you think it’s already too late, even in iraq?
I heard Izzat al Douri is praying five times a day now, Christopher. That he had pledged fealty to Zarqawi last year.
Stephen Ulph of the Jamestown Foundation says “the various Islamist groups in Iraq are fronts for the fallen regime’s intelligence departments.”
And all are led by Izzat.
http://jamestown.org/terrorism/news/article.php?articleid=2369808
In a rare interview with one of the members of Jaysh al-Muhammad,
[Arabic] http://arabic.tharwaproject.com/Aff-Sec/IWPR/ICR63/islamists.htm
the person said The US forces came to Iraq to get rid off Saddam’s regime, which they (Jaysh al-Muhammad) welcome, but their goal (US) is steeling Iraq’s resources, defending Israel, on other hand US soldiers behaving with Iraqis is one of the motivations to fight them.
He said also that they have Islamic representatives in the government, when the intervier asked him
Is it the Islamic Party??
He refused to answer
Another question:
Is there any connection between you (Jaysh al-Muhammad) and Al-Qaida?
The answer was “NO”
As I personally remember I read somewhere in an Arabic site that this (Jaysh al-Muhammad the second) loyal to Saddam is different from the first one.
I hope this will be some informative comment
You’re the terrorist, dickhead. Maybe the insurgents wouldn’t be driven to fundamentalism if you and your criminal buddies in the US military hadn’t invaded their country and stolen their resources.
I pray five times a day that you are kidnapped and beheaded on the Internet.