Boston TV stations nix “C-SPAN Baghdad”

Most local Boston tele­vi­sion sta­tions are refus­ing to use the Pentagon-sponsored footage out of Bagh­dad, dubbed “C-SPAN Bagh­dad,” which “I wrote”:http://www.back-to-iraq.com/archives/000489.php#000489 about ear­lier this month.

“I’m kind of appalled by it. I think it’s very trou­bling,” said Charles Kravetz, vice pres­i­dent of news at the regional cable news out­let NECN. “I think the gov­ern­ment has no busi­ness being in the news busi­ness.“
“We have no inter­est in this,” said WBZ-TV (Chan­nel 4) news direc­tor Peter Brown. “The Fourth Estate is inde­pen­dent and should remain so. As news providers, we should go there and see for ourselves.”

Gov­ern­ment offi­cials deny the footage is an effort on the part of the Pen­ta­gon to man­age the news com­ing out of Iraq.

“Basi­cally, this pro­vides us with the abil­ity to feed back brief­ing mate­ri­als and the sub­stance of what is hap­pen­ing in Bagh­dad to the Pen­ta­gon … on a real-time basis,” [said Dor­rence Smith, a for­mer ABC news­man now work­ing for the Coali­tion Pro­vi­sional Author­ity in Iraq and the man in charge of C-SPAN Bagh­dad.] “It’s for one or for all as opposed to the very few media who are here in Baghdad.”

Smith, by the way, is the guy who man­aged Pres­i­dent Bush’s media strat­egy in the Florida recount in 2000. And if that doesn’t make your blood pres­sure go up a bit, a Depart­ment of Defense spokesman Bryan Whit­man stressed that while the project’s func­tion is to pro­vide live brief­ings back to the Pen­ta­gon, he “wouldn’t want to rule out any­thing in the future.“

Atrios over at Escha­ton won’t give the sta­tions any props for not run­ning the feed, but I will — for now. Why don’t you read­ers send the guys at the sta­tions feed­back applaud­ing them for liv­ing up to their Fourth Estate duties (in this case) and encour­age them that their judg­ment in reject­ing the feed is appreciated.

  • WBZ-TV”:http://wbz4.com/feedback/

  • WHDH”:http://www.whdh.com/contact/
  • WCVB”:http://www.thebostonchannel.com/station/

Still, for all my blus­ter regard­ing C-SPAN Bagh­dad, I’m kind of inclined to agree with “Jack Shafer”:http://slate.msn.com/id/2092950/ over at “Slate”:http://www.slate.com, and not just because he links to me in the arti­cle. He’s of the mind that the Pentagon’s obvi­ous efforts at pro­pa­ganda will crash and burn because Amer­i­cans are more likely to watch _Seinfeld_ than they are to watch empty mil­i­tary cer­e­monies and video of sol­diers paint­ing schools. He also makes the inter­est­ing obser­va­tion that C-SPAN Bagh­dad will have the — surely unin­ten­tional — effect of putting the CPA and the admin­is­tra­tion on record regard­ing var­i­ous goings-on in Iraq. “Such a record of their own mak­ing would make this admin­is­tra­tion much more account­able than they already are,” he writes. “If the pro­pa­gan­dists insisted on putting a happy face on Iraq for U.S. news con­sumers while thou­sands of U.S. sol­diers die and Iraqis riot, they would lose all cred­i­bil­ity. But here they’re caught in a double-bind: If they tell the truth, they start con­verg­ing upon the inde­pen­dent press’s mis­sion and begin to negate their own rai­son d’etre.“
So while the Pentagon’s plan is exe­crable and an insult­ing waste of tax­pay­ers’ money, if more local sta­tions like those in Boston reject the feed and news con­sumers turn to a few of the upteen mil­lion media out­lets that can counter the feed — like this one! “Send me back to Iraq!”:https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=chris%40back-to-iraq.com&%0Aitem_name=Reports+from+the+%0AMiddle+East+by+an+independent+journalist — it’s likely the newest series from Bag­dad will be can­celled before the next season.

Pentagon avoids ‘news filter’

The Pen­ta­gon will begin broad­cast­ing “C-SPAN Baghdad”:http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A42547-2003Nov14&notFound=true soon — a satel­lite feed from Iraq that will cir­cum­vent the “fil­ter” of the national net­works and send images cho­sen by the Defense Depart­ment right into America’s liv­ing rooms by way of local news affil­i­ates. Why do this? Because:

Admin­is­tra­tion offi­cials assert that U.S. news orga­ni­za­tions have empha­sized vio­lence and set­backs in occu­pied Iraq while play­ing down progress. The offi­cials say the satel­lite capa­bil­ity is designed to help local sta­tions inter­view U.S. author­i­ties in Iraq and offer live cov­er­age of mil­i­tary cer­e­monies and brief­ings rel­e­vant to their geo­graphic areas.

Avoid­ing ques­tions from big-time reporters from the major net­works is part of of larger strat­egy begun last month by the Bush Admin­is­tra­tion which saw Bush, Defense Sec­re­tary Rums­feld and oth­ers gave inter­views to, for exam­ple, the local ABC affil­i­ate in Kalamzoo.

Con­tinue read­ing

It’s time to get moving

First of all, notice the name of this blog in the upper left. Time for a few changes around here. Sec­ondly, I received this email the other day from one of my con­trib­u­tors:

Mr. Allbrit­ton:
As a con­trib­u­tor to your trip to Iraq ear­lier this year, I wish you would return to Iraq and pro­vide an out­let for the col­lec­tive voice of the Iraqi peo­ple.
I have always been against the inva­sion of Iraq. I con­tinue to oppose our administration’s poli­cies. I feel that we are impos­ing our will rather than respect­ing the wishes of our fel­low human beings.
Would you con­sider return­ing to Iraq with the pur­pose of find­ing out just what the Iraqis want from us at this point?
With both sides of the polit­i­cal fence fail­ing to find answers, it just seems to make the most sense to turn straight to the source for answers.
If you can­not or choose not to return, can you please cre­ate a post that sum­ma­rizes pop­u­lar opin­ions of the var­i­ous Iraqi fac­tions towards the state of the coun­try and the con­tin­ued U.S. pres­ence? Or can you cre­ate a post that points to the best WWW out­lets for this kind of infor­ma­tion?
Thank you.
Sin­cerely,
Andrew Bren­ner
Whit­ing, Indi­ana USA

Andrew gra­ciously allowed me to repub­lish his note and use it as a start­ing to point to talk about some things.
Since the end of April, I’ve been back in New York, worked up a book pro­posal — which is cur­rently cir­cu­lat­ing; my agent reports that edi­tors are mak­ing interested-sounded noises — taught a class at “NYU”:http://journalism.nyu.edu on Dig­i­tal Jour­nal­ism and stewed and steamed while two coun­tries that I love, the United States and Iraq, march fur­ther down the road to a major league cock-up.
I’m not doing any­one any good here in New York. The action is over there, and while there are more reporters doing the jour­nal­ism of every day life, some­thing — I’m not sure what it is, exactly — is miss­ing from the cov­er­age.
So it’s time to get a move on and go back. But not as a reporter who goes there for a month and comes home. This time I would stay, per­haps per­ma­nently. My goal is to work up a return to the region, bas­ing myself in Bagh­dad and free­lance for major orga­ni­za­tions and con­tinue run­ning Back​-to​-Iraq​.com. In short, I would be your man in Bagh­dad, bring­ing my voice and expe­ri­ence that I gained dur­ing the war back to you.
This is not some gung-ho charge into the lion’s den in search of The Truth. I’ve stopped believ­ing there’s any such beast; there are only sto­ries to tell. But as dur­ing the early part of the war, in which donors directed cov­er­age by email­ing me sug­gested assign­ments, I would do that again. This time, how­ever, it would be on a long-term basis with an eye toward longish pieces that were both appeal­ing to you and mar­ketable as free­lance pieces (a guy’s got to earn a liv­ing, even there.)
No embed­ding, no hid­ing behind the skirts of the U.S. mil­i­tary. The Iraqi peo­ple would be front and cen­ter, and the big media corps can cover what they do. B2I would cover what _we_ want. I’d likely start with an empha­sis on the Kurdish/Arabic/Turkoman pow­derkeg known as Kirkuk, but only because it’s a good start­ing point. I’m most famil­iar with the issue there. How­ever, the Arabs got short shrift on this blog dur­ing the first part of the war. I’d like to rem­edy that.
My goal is to have enough money, $10,000 or so, in time to be on the ground and run­ning by March 26, 2004 early– to mid-May. Why that date? Because that’s exactly a year since I landed in Istan­bul and started work as the Web’s first fully reader-funded journalist-blogger I have teach­ing com­mit­ments at NYU that end May 3. This time, the money would go for set­ting myself up and hav­ing a small padding to make it through the time before free­lance cash begins to come my way.
I’m work­ing out plans now for what to do with my apart­ment, where to move to in the mean­time to save money, since that’s impos­si­ble on New York professor/freelance wages. I’ll prob­a­bly be out on my brother’s couch in Cal­i­for­nia for a few months before head­ing over.
And so we come to the crux of this note. You all were so gen­er­ous last time, and I hate to ask, but I ask you all to feel invested again and donate to this endeavor. Same deal as before. Donors get on a spe­cial list­serv that gets dis­patches before the Web site does. They will get extra dis­patches and pho­tos. They also get a pipeline to me to act as assign­ment edi­tors.
Now, in the inter­est of full dis­clo­sure, you all should know that this endeavor can’t be the not-for-profit jaunt the last trip was. Then, I specif­i­cally rejected free­lance assign­ments from mag­a­zines so I could con­cen­trate on pure blog­ging. I can’t do that this time, as the money raised from this fund-raising call, as well as my own sav­ings, will go for the ini­tial costs of estab­lish­ing a pres­ence in Bagh­dad. After that, I’ll have to sup­port myself with string­ing and free­lanc­ing. But I promise you that B2I will remain a non-commercial blog with you, the read­ers, and the Iraqi peo­ple front and cen­ter. No one will edit this blog but me, and I won’t let other free­lanc­ing inter­fere with it.
So what do you say? Shall we suit up again for New New Jour­nal­ism? I hope so.

Speaking at UT Austin on Tuesday

On Tues­day, I’ll be speak­ing at the con­fer­ence, “Reshap­ing the Cov­er­age of Con­flict: Jour­nal­ists at War,” pre­sented by the Cen­ter for Amer­i­can His­tory and the Uni­ver­sity of Texas at Austin’s jour­nal­ism school. I’ll try to blog the “day”:http://ical.mac.com/WebObjects/iCal.woa/wa/default?d=4&u=callbritton&v=2&y=2003&m=10&n=Back32to32Iraq.ics (click the link to see the sched­ule), but I’m not sure what my Net access will be. It might have to wait until I get back to the hotel.

Hm, that’s a good idea…

Josh over at Talk­ing Points Memo is propos­ing to cover the New Hamp­shire pri­mary for his blog by ask­ing his read­ers to fund him to go on the trip.
Hm. Where have I heard that idea before?
OK. I’m not really miffed that he’s using B2I’s rev­enue model. I hope he pulls it off, as I think (for obvi­ous rea­sons) that this kind of “epic event cov­er­age” by pro­fes­sional blog­gers can really advance the medium and drive the rev­enue model for­ward. I urge peo­ple to donate once he gets his plan more in place. I plan to.
But, Josh: Would it _kill_ you to men­tion B2I?
*UPDATE* To Aaron et al. I was _joking_ in my pique. I wasn’t really miffed, as I pointed out and I really would like to see more of this kind of journalism-blogging. As I’ve pointed out in the past, while I may have been the first, I cer­tainly hope I’m not the last to do this kind of reader-funded reporting.