Back in Iraq

DUHOK, Iraqi Kur­dis­tan — Well, that last post was quite a cliff-hanger, wasn’t it? How­ever, after two nights and a day of walk­ing — well, walk­ing, march­ing, climb­ing, scram­bling — from Turkey to Iraq, I can con­firm that I’m safe and well in Duhok at the Jiyan Palace Hotel. The cross­ing was a Bataan death march. Luck­ily we sur­vived. I’m exhausted. It’s 4 p.m. here in Iraq, and I need to sleep for a while. Sorry for no details on this one, but I’m just absolutely knack­ered.
At least I’m alive. Now, I can get to work.

POWs and another letter from Erbil

The big story today is the cap­ture of U.S. sol­diers by Iraqi troops around an Nasiriya. Al Jazeera and Iraqi TV showed footage of the sol­diers — as well as bod­ies said to be sol­diers. Two of the troops iD’ed their unit at the 507th Main­te­nance. A woman was among those cap­tured.
In a sep­a­rate inci­dent, U.S. Sec­re­tary of Defense Don­ald H. Rums­feld acknowl­edged that some sol­diers were miss­ing, but said the num­ber was “fewer than 10.” (Strat­for reports that the num­ber is actu­ally 12, and that the sol­diers took a wrong turn and are now lost.)
Regard­ing the Amer­i­can cap­tives, on Meet the Press today, Rums­feld said the Iraqis had an oblig­a­tion, under the Geneva Con­ven­tions, to respect the rights of any POWs. ““It’s ille­gal to do things to POWs that are humil­i­at­ing to those pris­on­ers,” he said.
Under Arti­cle 3 of the Con­ven­tions, each war­ring party “shall be bound to apply, as a min­i­mum, the fol­low­ing provisions:

Per­sons tak­ing no active part in the hos­til­i­ties, includ­ing mem­bers of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed hors de com­bat by sick­ness, wounds, deten­tion, or any other cause, shall in all cir­cum­stances be treated humanely, with­out any adverse dis­tinc­tion founded on race, colour, reli­gion or faith, sex, birth or wealth, or any other sim­i­lar cri­te­ria.
To this end, the fol­low­ing acts are and shall remain pro­hib­ited at any time and in any place what­so­ever with respect to the above-mentioned per­sons:

  1. Vio­lence to life and per­son, in par­tic­u­lar mur­der of all kinds, muti­la­tion, cruel treat­ment and torture;

  2. Tak­ing of hostages;
  3. Out­rages upon per­sonal dig­nity, in par­tic­u­lar humil­i­at­ing and degrad­ing treatment;
  4. The pass­ing of sen­tences and the car­ry­ing out of exe­cu­tions with­out pre­vi­ous judg­ment pro­nounced by a reg­u­larly con­sti­tuted court, afford­ing all the judi­cial guar­an­tees which are rec­og­nized as indis­pens­able by civ­i­lized peoples.

The United States of course avoids show­ing pris­on­ers of war,” Rums­feld said. “We have thou­sands of Iraqi pris­on­ers that are in POW camps … but we avoid show­ing pho­tographs of them.“
Hm. While I agree that Iraq should fol­low the let­ter and spirit of the Con­ven­tions, the U.S. has been less than thor­ough in keep­ing true to these pro­to­cols itself, weak­en­ing its case. The pris­on­ers at Camp X-Ray in Guan­tanamo Bay have been held in a legal limbo for months now. Some have been shipped to other coun­tries that employ hor­rific inter­ro­ga­tion meth­ods. Human Rights Watch has urged the Bush Admin­is­tra­tion to deter­mine the detainees’ sta­tus and then launch crim­i­nal pros­e­cu­tion “where cred­i­ble evi­dence exists.” Indef­i­nite deten­tion is not legal under the Con­ven­tions, despite Pres­i­dent Bush’s claim to be uphold­ing the “prin­ci­ples” of the Third Con­ven­tion. As the report from HRW said:

This short­sighted trans­gres­sion sets a dan­ger­ous prece­dent that could come back to haunt U.S. and allied service-members who are cap­tured by enemy forces in this or future wars. Washington’s refusal to treat the detainees as POWs is per­plex­ing because it would in no way inhibit legit­i­mate U.S. efforts to inter­ro­gate or pros­e­cute peo­ple who have par­tic­i­pated in ter­ror­ist acts.

In other news, Iraqi resis­tance is stiff­en­ing, as the bat­tle for Basra rages on. Col. Khaled al-Hashemi, Iraqi com­man­der of the 51st Mech­a­nized Divi­sion near that city, said March 23 that his divi­sion, reported ear­lier to have sur­ren­dered, would con­tinue to fight against U.S. and British forces. “I am with my men in Basra; we con­tinue to defend the peo­ple and riches” of the town, Al-Hashemi said. [Strat­for]
Also: “Com­bat in An Nasiriyah in south­east­ern Iraq has extended to the cities of Samava, Bataha and Sot al-Sheikh and Hour in the south­ern province of An Najaf. Accord­ing to reports released by mil­i­tary sources inside Iraq lis­ten­ing to allied radio, U.S. and British forces have called for rein­force­ments, more arma­ment, artillery and heli­copter gun-ships.“
U.S. Spe­cial Forces are fly­ing into Iraqi Kur­dis­tan to be deployed around the town of Hal­abja, accord­ing to senior PUK offi­cials. (Likely a backup for actions against Ansar al-Islam. KDP pesh­mer­gas have allegedly fought off a small Iraqi attack near Tepe Garus, about 15 kilo­me­ters from Arbil. [ibid.]
Also, I heard from Djoy, the Kur­dish man in Arbil, who wrote to me last week:

Hello Christo­pher,
Thanks for writ­ing and thanks for your safety wishes. I got back to Erbil city this morn­ing because it was no longer bear­able or log­i­cal to stay in that vil­lage espe­cially after we noticed the very slow pace of the war! any­how we are still tak­ing pre­cau­tions.
I hope you will make it to Iraq soon but please take care of your­self as its a real dan­ger­ous sit­u­a­tion here and com­pletely unpre­dictable! maybe I will see you in Iraq and hope I can be of help.
You too keep safe,
djoy

More sup­plies to buy today (Gotta restock the first aid kit.) Then tomor­row and Tues­day I’ll be tying up loose ends. Still look­ing at a Wednes­day depar­ture. I’m only wait­ing on Pay­Pal funds to clear and the lap­top to arrive.

Ansar strikes back

Ivan Wat­son, an NPR reporter in Hal­abja, the town best known for the 1988 chem­i­cal attacks near the Iran­ian bor­der, reports that last night the Islamist group Ansar al-Islam came under attack from Amer­i­can cruise mis­siles and bomb­ing. This morn­ing, Ansar appar­ently struck back with a sui­cide car bomb in Hal­abja that killed three pesh­mer­gas and injured nine oth­ers. (Back­ground on Ansar here and here.)
Wat­son described the car bomb in Hal­abja as a “deadly retal­ia­tory attack.” Ansar has been accused of hav­ing ties to al Qa’ida, and the Bush admin­is­tra­tion has said its pres­ence in Iraq proves ties between Bagh­dad and Osama bin Ladin. While intrigu­ing, the ties have never been proved con­clu­sively.
Ansar has been wag­ing a war against PUK lead­er­ship, and has assas­si­nated sev­eral lead­ing PUK fig­ures in the past few months. While I was inter­view­ing PUK Inte­rior Min­is­ter Faraidoon Abdul Qisadir last sum­mer in Suleimaniya, he showed me a note — in Kur­dish or Ara­bic, I’m not sure — that he said proved the group was get­ting fund­ing from Bagh­dad. He wouldn’t let me make a copy of the note so I could get it inde­pen­dently trans­lated, how­ever, so there’s no way I could have ver­i­fied its con­tent.
Dur­ing the meet­ing, an aide brought him another note that he said indi­cated a car bomb, likely headed for my hotel, had exploded on a hill out­side Suleimaniya. Again, I was unable to ver­ify this, but I did see a smoke plume ris­ing from a hill out­side the city after the inter­view. I had been in Hal­abja just the day before and Qisadir spec­u­lated that Ansar agents had seen me.

Turks on the march

Well, this is just great. Reuters is report­ing that Turk­ish for­eign min­is­ter (and pre­vi­ous prime min­is­ter) Abdul­lah Gul said that Turk­ish troops will soon be mov­ing into Iraqi Kur­dis­tan “within the next few hours.” [BBC]
Jonny Dymond of BBC says Turkey has up to 10,000 troops are sit­ting on the bor­der wait­ing to move into Iraqi Kur­dis­tan.
[UPDATE 6:57 p.m. EST: BBC is report­ing that Turks have already crossed the bor­ders.]
This is slap to the United States, which has “cau­tioned” the Turks not to move into the region, but the nego­ti­a­tions between Turkey and the United States pos­si­bly grew so bit­ter that Turkey feels it now doesn’t trust the United States to watch out for its inter­ests in Iraqi Kur­dis­tan.
Qubad Jalal Tal­a­bani, the deputy rep­re­sen­ta­tive of the PUK in Wash­ing­ton, appeared on BBC to explain his party’s view­point.
“It is very wor­ry­ing for my peo­ple,” he said. “We believe that Turk­ish inter­ven­tion in Iraqi Kur­dis­tan is a recipe for dis­as­ter.“
He wor­ried about the prece­dent it might set, and expressed con­cern that Iran or Syria might also decide to move troops into the region to pro­tect their own inter­ests. (Syria and Iran have their own rest­less Kur­dish pop­u­la­tions.)
Kurds have faced this threat for some time now, and many Kurds have pledged to fight the Turks. In an email sent to me some days ago from Arbil, Karzan Aziz, a friend of mine, said, “I do believe that Turkey will face prob­lems if [it] invaded Kurdistan,�as I have met so many peo­ple [who] all repeat the same thing: ‘As we�have been fight­ing against Sad­dam from many decades, we are ready to�fight Turkey some more other decades.’”
Turkey says its goal is to pre­vent an influx of refugees and “ter­ror­ist activ­i­ties,” accord­ing to Gul.
[ASIDE: BBC also is report­ing that Turkey has finally agreed to open up its air­space. Since this has flipped back and forth all day, I’ll believe this when F-16s fly over Incir­lik.]
But Tal­a­bani said this is not needed. “The dis­place­ment of the pop­u­la­tion at the moment is not head­ing toward the moun­tain­ous bor­ders,” he said. “They’re dis­pers­ing among their fam­i­lies in the nearby towns and vil­lages.“
“The Kur­dish peo­ple are actu­ally con­cerned that the Turk­ish mil­i­tary inter­ven­tion is not to pre­vent an influx of refugees into Turkey, but it is in effect an attempt to stran­gle Kur­dish aspi­ra­tions,” he added.
Many Kurds feel this is the first step toward Turk­ish attempts to annex ter­ri­tory. (It has long cov­eted the oil-fields around Kirkuk and Mosul.)
“We under­stand the allied forces will prob­a­bly try to leave our region as quickly as pos­si­bly,” Tal­a­bani said. “But I’m not sure the same can be said for our neighbors.”

Here come the Turks?

Thursday’s vote in the Turk­ish Par­lia­ment to allow U.S. planes access to Turkey’s air­space is on hold in the face of U.S. oppo­si­tion to Turkey send­ing troops into Iraqi Kur­dis­tan. [CNN] So, still no north­ern front.
And lis­ten­ing to CNN, MSNBC et al. would lead one to believe that vic­tory is at hand… That may be so but Kos has a good run-down on trou­bling reports from Reuters that things are not going as smoothly as the net­works and 24-hour news chan­nels might lead peo­ple to believe.
The tough­est bat­tles are yet to come. Strat­for lists the bridges across the Euphrates and the city of Basra as the real tests of Iraqi resis­tance. If the Iraqis don’t attempt to blow the bridge at al-Nasiriyah or offer only token resis­tance in Basra, “then the will of the Iraqi forces to fight has indeed col­lapsed.” [Strat­for] It is, as yet, too early to tell if that is the case.
Umm Qasr is still not 100 per­cent in the con­trol of the British [Reuters], but Ha’aretz and AP are report­ing that U.S. marines will soon be in con­trol.
[UPDATE: 12:26 PM EST, AP reports that U.S. Marines of the 15th MEU, under British com­mand, have taken Umm Qasr. Con­trol allows access to a port for mat�riel and human­i­tar­ian sup­plies.]
At 1734 GMT, Al Jazeera reported bomb­ings in the north­ern oil city of Mosul.
At 1730 GMT, another Marine from the 1st MEU was KIA, with another injured, U.S. defense offi­cials con­firmed. The Marines took fire dur­ing an oper­a­tion near Rumaila.
It seems “A-Day,” the start of “shock and awe” is begin­ning. And just as a side com­ment, I was lis­ten­ing to NPR this morn­ing and the announc­ers sounds almost dis­ap­pointed that they had not seen the “shock and awe” cam­paign yet. Per­haps I’m just being snippy, though.
If this is the begin­ning of shock and awe, it means the Pen­ta­gon has given up on the smaller hits designed to sow con­fu­sion in the Iraqi lead­er­ship and that the full scale bom­bard­ment has begun. The Pen­ta­gon was likely hop­ing to avoid this by punch­ing hard but back­ing off, and see­ing if they could either get the Iraqis to top­ple Sad­dam in a mat­ter of days or they were try­ing to smoke out the lead­er­ship.
Sat-phone and rugged lap­top en route. Will depart for Ankara next week, prob­a­bly Wednes­day or Thurs­day. Will try to hook up with other pho­tog­ra­pher who, like me, is look­ing to get into Iraqi Kur­dis­tan. Let’s hope all goes well…