The Birthplace of Civil War

AIN EL-RUMMANE, Lebanon — It’s an odd place to start a war.

Ain el-Rummane, a Chris­t­ian neigh­bor­hood in the hills above Beirut occu­pies an omi­nous place in Lebanese his­tory. It was here, in 1975, near a statue of the Vir­gin, that a bus full of Pales­tin­ian refugees was ambushed by Chris­t­ian mili­ti­a­men. It was a mas­sacre in response to an assas­si­na­tion attempt, and the reprisals it gen­er­ated in turn quickly grew into the Lebanese civil war.

And now this res­i­den­tial neigh­bor­hood may pro­vide some of the sol­diers to fight in a new one. Mem­bers of the Lebanese Forces, the same mili­tia that killed the Pales­tini­ans in 1975, still claim Ain el-Rummane as home and they sim­mered Wednes­day, the day after the grand­son of the founder of their polit­i­cal party was killed by assas­sins on a busy Beirut street in mid-afternoon.

One more mis­take and we will take the streets with our hands,” said Arz Wehbe, 27, a mem­ber of the mili­tia. “There are no weapons out now, but when it becomes seri­ous, we will take weapons from under the ground.”

The assas­si­na­tion of the 34-year-old Pierre Gemayel, Lebanon’s min­is­ter of indus­try, on Tues­day was the lat­est, most omi­nous devel­op­ment in Lebanon’s lat­est, most omi­nous polit­i­cal cri­sis that began in Feb­ru­ary 2005 with the mur­der of for­mer prime min­is­ter Rafik Hariri. Since then, Lebanon has seen five assas­si­na­tions, 15 bomb­ings, a vicious war between Hezbol­lah and Israel and an attempt by the Shi’ite group to top­ple the elected government.

But Gemayel’s death is more than just another assas­si­na­tion, because he was the first sit­ting mem­ber of gov­ern­ment to be killed and his death brings the spec­tre of a gov­ern­ment col­lapse closer than ever. Two weeks ago, five Shi’ite min­is­ters and a pro-Syrian Chris­t­ian min­is­ter resigned from Fuad Siniora’s U.S.-backed cab­i­net over the issue of the approval of an inter­na­tional tri­bunal on Hariri’s killing — which many think would impli­cate senior Syr­ian offi­cials. Other politi­cians gave omi­nous warn­ings that Syria would try to assas­si­nate some of the remain­ing cab­i­net min­is­ters in order to reduce it below its quo­rum level of 16 mem­bers. With Gemayel’s death, only two min­is­ters stand against its dis­so­lu­tion, and with it the inter­na­tional tribunal.

In Lebanon, his­tory casts a long shadow. It was an attempt on the life of his grand­fa­ther, the Pha­langist Party founder who was also named Pierre Gemayel, that sparked the mas­sacre in Ain el-Rummane 31 years ago.

We will not shut up, we will not be silent,” said Wehbe. “Even if the coun­try is destroyed, we will stay.”

Another Lebanese Forces loy­al­ist, Simon Ghanime, 39, said that every­one was ready to take to the streets. They were just wait­ing for word from their lead­ers, Samir Geagea, the leader of the Lebanese Forces, and Amin Gemayel, the slain man’s father and a for­mer president.

At the end of the day, you have to defend your­self,” Ghanime said. “I lis­ten always to my leader.“
And if, at the end of the day, Geagea or Amin Gemayel says fight?

Then we have to fight,” he said with a shrug. “They are hunt­ing us (Chris­tians) like birds.”

For now Amin Gemayel has coun­seled patience and prayer in Bik­faya where his son would be buried on Thurs­day. But in Beirut and its sub­urbs like Ain el-Rummane, angry men prowled the streets.

I won’t leave Lebanon to the Shi’ites or the Syr­i­ans,” said Char­bel Nas­ral­lah, 24, from a mas­sive con­voy that was pass­ing the Pha­langist Party Head­quar­ters in East Beirut. “We don’t want Syr­i­ans or Ira­ni­ans to decide our fates. We will.”

But even within the ranks of Lebanon’s right-wing Chris­tians, there are those with less appetite for confrontation.

The aim of March 8″ — the name of the pro-Syrian coali­tion — “is to get us to fight,” said a for­mer Lebanese Forces fighter who gave his name only as Car­los. “We can’t slip into this trap. It’s in their inter­est to get us to fight, but we don’t want that.”

Another man who was tap­ing pic­tures of the slain Gemayel to his car and who gave his name only as Eli echoed the idea that Lebanon’s Chris­tians must unite and not fall into the trap of vio­lence set by Syria and other for­eign pow­ers. But he said that even he would fight if his lead­ers told him to.

To ensure the Chris­tians stay in this part of the world?” he asked. “Of course I would fight.”

Orig­i­nally pub­lished in the Newark Star-Ledger.

Pierre Gemayel has been assassinated

BEIRUT — Pierre Gemayel, indus­try min­is­ter in the Sin­iora cab­i­net, a major Chris­t­ian leader and an anti-Syrian politi­cian has been shot to death in the street. This comes at an extremely tense time in which the anti-Syrian and pro-Syrian camps are close to com­ing to blows.

I don’t know much right now, but this could be the spark in the can of gaso­line that Lebanon has become.

UPDATE: Here’s the story I filed for the San Fran­cisco Chron­i­cle:

BEIRUT — With the killing of Pierre Gemayel, Lebanon’s indus­try min­is­ter and the scion of one its most influ­en­tial Chris­t­ian fam­i­lies, Lebanese pol­i­tics took a dan­ger­ous turn with the Chris­t­ian com­mu­nity deeply split and the U.S.-backed gov­ern­ment more under siege than ever.

Gemayel, 34, a mem­ber of Lebanon’s polit­i­cal elite, was killed at approx­i­mately 3:30 p.m. gang­land style Tues­day when his car was rammed by two other cars and gun­men leaped out and sprayed his vehi­cle with assault rife fire.

His body was taken to St. Joseph Hos­pi­tal in a Chris­t­ian neigh­bor­hood on the out­skirts of Beirut. As the news broke, sev­eral hun­dred sup­port­ers of the Pha­langist party, gath­ered as a show of sol­i­dar­ity and an out­let for their rage against their Chris­t­ian rivals, the Free Patri­otic Move­ment, and Shi’ites.

Fuck Nas­ral­lah!” many chanted, refer­ring to the leader of the Shi’ite mili­tia Hezbol­lah. “Fuck Michel Aoun!”

Aoun is the head of the FPM, and there has been bad blood between the Gemayel fam­ily, Aoun and the Shi’ites in Lebanon for years. Dur­ing the lat­ter days of the Lebanese civil war, forces loyal to Aoun bat­tled Chris­t­ian mem­bers of the Pha­langist and Lebanese Forces mili­tias in some of the blood­i­est bat­tles of that 15-year-long con­flict. Pierre Gemayel him­self infa­mously said last year that Shi’ites may have the num­bers, but the Chris­tians had the “qual­ity” to run the country.

The crowd at the hos­pi­tal veered dan­ger­ously in its moods. One moment, it was a mass of somber griev­ers and the next it came dan­ger­ously close to being a lynch mob for any­one they thought might be friendly to Hezbol­lah or Aoun.

The ene­mies of Lebanon are known: Aoun, Nas­ral­lah,” said Joseph Ger­manos, a party loy­al­ist. “They want to cre­ate a new war.”

The assas­si­na­tion was roundly denounced, includ­ing by Hezbol­lah, but Aoun gave a press state­ment that was remark­able in its brevity and lack of emo­tion. “This crime is against the unity of the Lebanese and is an attempt to sow dis­cord among the Chris­t­ian ranks,” he said in a flat tone. “I invite all Lebanese to remain calm, and I offer my deep­est sym­pa­thies to Sheikh Amin Gemayel, and to his wife and fam­ily, the Pha­langists and to all Lebanese.”

Today is the 70th anniver­sary of the found­ing if the Pha­lange Party by Gemayel’s grand­fa­ther, also named Pierre Gemayel.

Last week, Samir Geagea, the leader of the Lebanese Forces, warned that a cam­paign of assas­si­na­tions was in the works and would be aimed at the remain­ing mem­bers of the cab­i­net in a bid to force its collapse.

They are killing our Chris­t­ian lead­ers so the truth won’t show,” Ger­manos said.

There is a wide­spread sen­ti­ment among many Lebanese that Syria is behind a string of 15 car bomb­ings, includ­ing five assas­si­na­tions, that started Feb. 14, 2005 with a mas­sive truck bomb that killed for­mer prime min­is­ter Rafik Hariri and 22 oth­ers. The U.S.-backed gov­ern­ment of Fuad Sin­iora, which is sup­ported by an anti-Syrian bloc in par­lia­ment, recently voted to approve an inter­na­tional tri­bunal that would try sus­pects in the killings. Many in Lebanon expect the court’s find­ings to impli­cate high-level Syr­i­ans in the ter­ror cam­paign against Lebanon.

But the five Shi’ite min­is­ters in the cab­i­net rep­re­sent­ing Hezbol­lah and its allies, along with a pro-Syrian Chris­t­ian min­is­ter, resigned ahead of the vote in protest and said Siniora’s gov­ern­ment was uncon­sti­tu­tional because of the lack of Shi’ite rep­re­sen­ta­tion. Hezbol­lah then ratch­eted up ten­sions in the coun­try with promises of mas­sive protests, expected on Thurs­day, it says are designed to bring about the col­lapse of the Sin­iora gov­ern­ment. Under Lebanon’s polit­i­cal rules, if nine of the Cabinet’s 24 min­is­ters resign or are absent, the gov­ern­ment must resign. With the death of Gemayel, only two min­is­ters stand in the way of this outcome.

Iron­i­cally, how­ever, the mur­der of Gemayel could put Hezbol­lah on the defen­sive because of its close ties to Syria and force the mili­tia into a compromise.

It puts Hezbol­lah in the embar­rass­ing posi­tion in the sense that they have been so bla­tantly defend­ing Syria’s inter­ests,” said Reinoud Leen­ders, an assis­tant pro­fes­sor of inter­na­tional rela­tions at the Uni­ver­sity of Ams­ter­dam and a for­mer ana­lyst for the Inter­na­tional Cri­sis Group in Beirut. “They have been put in the Syr­ian camp much more than in the past. I just have a sense that peo­ple are skep­ti­cal of Hezbollah’s recent moves.”

With the likely Secu­rity Coun­cil approval of the inter­na­tional tri­bunal on Thurs­day, Syria may be play­ing a dou­ble game, spec­u­lates Leen­ders. Wash­ing­ton has been reach­ing out to Dam­as­cus recently for help in Iraq, and the regime there may be try­ing to make a point to the United States.

I wouldn’t rule out them being a pain in the neck and at the same time reach­ing out to Wash­ing­ton,” he said. “They might be try­ing to con­vey a mes­sage: ‘You have to talk to us, because oth­er­wise we can be a pain in the neck.’ I wouldn’t rule out them being behind it.”

Already, youths sur­round­ing the Pha­langist head­quar­ters in East Beirut say they plan to stay in the streets as a counter to any demon­stra­tions Hezbol­lah might plan. These demon­stra­tions by the anti-Syrian camp could “pre-empt” the Hezbol­lah one and weaken their effec­tive­ness, said Amal Saad-Ghorayeb, a vis­it­ing scholar at the Carnegie Cen­ter for Inter­na­tional Peace and an expert on Hezbollah.

March 8 will have a hard time with the demon­stra­tions now,” she said “March 8″ is what Hezbol­lah and its other pro-Syrian allies calls its coali­tion. Chris­t­ian sym­pa­thy for Aoun also may leech away, she said.

But the threat of mas­sive street protests by Hezbol­lah and the Aounists still looms, and the pos­si­bil­ity of renewed civil con­flict between the two camps is very real.

All the ele­ments are there for clashes, and pretty seri­ous ones,” said Leen­ders. “The polit­i­cal process is bogged down, the talk of war, the creepy signs before the storm atmos­phere. I’m pretty worried.”

When asked if they were pre­pared to fight their ene­mies in the street, one young man in the crowd at the hos­pi­tal, who declined to give his name other than Kataeb — Ara­bic for “Phalangist” — said, “We lost every­thing. We don’t have any­thing to lose again.”

Another young man said he was just wait­ing for the sig­nal from Pierre’s father, Amin Gemayel, a for­mer pres­i­dent of Lebanon.

What­ever Pres­i­dent Gemayel says,” said David Jaara, 25. “We are pre­pared for 10,000 mar­tyrs, 20,000. We are prepared.”

Misimpressions about Lebanon

BEIRUT — Well, the oafs at Lit­tle Green Foot­balls are at it again. Of course, they never stopped. But it gives me a chance to point out the sheer wrong­ness of their world­view and clear up some wrong ideas about Lebanon. At the end of the day, we all learn some­thing, right?

Any­way, LGF is warn­ing that Lebanon is hang­ing in the bal­ance with Hezbollah’s com­ing putsch against the American-friendly Sin­iora gov­ern­ment. Now, like a bro­ken clock, even blovi­at­ing idiots can be right now and then assum­ing they talk enough, but the LGF’s com­menters of course blow it:

There should be some way to get Lebanese Chris­tians out of there before it’s too late.

I have a cou­ple of frends, Lebanese Chris­tians, that still have fam­ily there. I hope they get out before it’s too late.

The Chris­t­ian city dwellers will rue the day they let these sav­ages immi­grate. (not sure what this means… — CA)

The Chris­tians in Beirut have been whistling past the graveyard.

Chris­tians are being heav­ily per­se­cuted in most of the mus­lim coun­tries, with the worst in the ME. Per​se​cu​tion​.com has lots of infor­ma­tion about it.

Lebanon

In 1968 70% Christian.

In 2006 45% Christian.

The gain was almost all for the mus­lims; the pales­tin­ian tsunami.

Such com­ments always inspire in me a Lou Reed-size world-weary sigh. Yes, it’s all so sim­ple: evil Mus­lims, per­se­cuted Christians.

Except, it’s com­pletely wrong.

Hezbollah’s strongest ally in its push to top­ple the gov­ern­ment is … Chris­t­ian. It’s the Free Patri­otic Move­ment headed by Maronite politi­cian Michel Aoun, a man who’s so obsessed with being Pres­i­dent that he will ally with the peo­ple who work for his old enemy: Syria.

And the Free Patri­otic Move­ment is sup­ported by — by some esti­mates — up to 70 per­cent of Lebanon’s Chris­tians. The rest fall mainly into Samir Geagea’s camp, the Lebanese Forces, a party/militia that owes traces it its pede­gree to the Hitler Youth of the 1930s. (No won­der the LGF ogres like it.)

This cur­rent polit­i­cal fight here has very lit­tle to do with Chris­t­ian vs. Mus­lims. Instead, it’s a fight between a pro-Syrian bloc (Hezbol­lah, Amal, FPM and a few smaller par­ties) and an anti-Syrian bloc (Future Move­ment, Lebanese Forces and Pro­gres­sive Social­ist Party). And this split in the Lebanese polit­i­cal soci­ety mir­rors the greater strug­gle for the Mid­dle East: the con­test for influ­ence between the United States and the Islamic Repub­lic of Iran.

There’s lot more to say about this — I’ve writ­ten about it before “here”:http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/07/02/INGIJJM87B1.DTL&hw=allbritton&sn=001&sc=1000 and “here”:http://www.back-to-iraq.com/archives/2006/11/lebanon_hurtles_toward_crisis.php — but I’m on dead­line. More later, if possible.

Oh, and com­ments are still fubar’ed. Still try­ing to fix that.

Lebanon hurtles toward crisis

A story I filed for the _Singapore Strait Times_:

BEIRUT — Lebanon found itself hurtling fur­ther toward polit­i­cal cri­sis today, brought on by a head-on col­li­sion between pro– and anti-Syrian blocs over what appeared to be dis­putes con­cern­ing power-sharing in the gov­ern­ment and the approval of an inter­na­tional tri­bunal to try sus­pects in the mur­der of for­mer prime min­is­ter Rafik Hariri.
The ten­sions boiled over when five Shi’ite and one Chris­t­ian cab­i­net min­is­ters resigned from Prime Min­is­ter Fuad Siniora’s gov­ern­ment yes­ter­day and today after a new round of national rec­on­cil­i­a­tion talks broke down last week. The Shi’ites, rep­re­sented mainly by the mil­i­tant group Hezbol­lah, are demand­ing a “national unity” gov­ern­ment with one-third of the seats in Siniora’s cab­i­net for them­selves and their pro-Syrian polit­i­cal allies, a dis­tri­b­u­tion of power that would give them veto power over any deci­sions the gov­ern­ment makes.
And one of the deci­sions con­cerns the approval of an inter­na­tional tri­bunal to try sus­pects in the mur­der of Hariri, who was killed along with 22 other peo­ple on Feb. 14, 2005, in a mas­sive car bomb in cen­tral Beirut. Siniora’s cab­i­net approved the tri­bunal Mon­day after a three-hour meet­ing down­town, despite the absence of the six pro-Syrian min­is­ters.
“Our aim is to achieve jus­tice and only jus­tice,” Sin­iora said after the meet­ing. The draft doc­u­ment now goes to the Secu­rity Coun­cil for endorse­ment.
But whether Lebanon’s prime min­is­ter can achieve any­thing with Hezbol­lah and its allies arrayed against him is ques­tion­able. Were Hezbol­lah and its allies to gain the veto power they want, the could scut­tle the inter­na­tional tri­bunal.
“We have been wait­ing for the court to take shape and to reach this day,” said Tourism Min­is­ter and Sin­iora ally Joe Sarkis. “If the inten­tions of all were pure, every­one should have par­tic­i­pated in uncov­er­ing the truth about who killed Rafik Hariri. … We should have all been united over this and they could have resigned tomor­row.“
Under Lebanon’s com­pli­cated rules of gov­er­nance, if one-third of the cab­i­net resigns, the gov­ern­ment col­lapses and a new must be formed. The remain­ing 18 min­is­ters seem loyal to Sin­iora, how­ever, and seem unlikely to resign.
That hasn’t stopped some oppo­si­tion fig­ures from from ques­tion­ing Siniora’s legit­i­macy. Pres­i­dent Emile Lahoud, a Maronite Chris­t­ian and Syr­ian ally, said Sun­day that Siniora’s gov­ern­ment was no longer legit­i­mate because the Lebanese con­sti­tu­tion requires that “all sects should be justly rep­re­sented in the Cab­i­net.” He fur­ther claimed that with the Shi’ite walk­out, all deci­sions of the cab­i­net were “null and void.“
Sin­iora says his gov­ern­ment has all the legit­i­macy it needs but with­out Hezbollah’s back­ing in Par­lia­ment, he will find it dif­fi­cult to get any leg­is­la­tion passed, espe­cially the inter­na­tional tri­bunal. After its endorse­ment by the Secu­rity Coun­cil, it is handed back to the cab­i­net for final approval, signed by the pres­i­dent and passed by par­lia­ment.
The Shi’ite mili­tia has threat­ened mas­sive street protests unless the cab­i­net is reshuf­fled more to its lik­ing, a polit­i­cal switch-up that the group says reflects its real sup­port among the Lebanese in the wake of this summer’s 34-day between Hezbol­lah and Israel, brought on by the group’s cap­ture of two Israeli sol­diers on July 12. It was a war that ended in what could best be called a stale­mate, but which Hezbol­lah sup­port­ers hailed as a “divine vic­tory.” Hezbollah’s ene­mies in the gov­ern­ment, how­ever, saw the war as a reck­less adven­ture into which the group dragged Lebanon against its will.
The Shi’ite group was embold­ened how­ever, and with what the United States says is back­ing from Iran and Syria, has made a polit­i­cal putsch against the cur­rent, pro-Western Sin­iora gov­ern­ment. There are many in Lebanon who feel that the inter­na­tional tri­bunal will impli­cate senior mem­bers of the Syr­ian regime, which relies on Hezbol­lah to guard its inter­ests in Lebanon and to serve as a van­guard against Israel.
How­ever, the fright­ful Israeli mil­i­tary response likely left Hezbol­lah more dam­aged than it’s will­ing to let on, and its ene­mies smelled blood in the water. This wasn’t some­thing Hezbol­lah could allow.
“Hezbol­lah is more con­cerned, more weak­ened,” said Reinoud Leen­ders, a for­mer ana­lyst for the Inter­na­tional Cri­sis Group in Beirut. The walk­out, the threats and the demands, he said, are intended to tie up the polit­i­cal process in Beirut and buy them time to rearm. “This ‘unity gov­ern­ment’ is clearly designed to par­a­lyze any decision-making process.“
Not so, coun­ters Nawar Sahili, a Hezbol­lah mem­ber of par­lia­ment but not a cab­i­net mem­ber. By walk­ing out, he says, they are fol­low­ing in the tra­di­tion of democ­racy in which oppo­si­tion par­ties don’t take part in gov­ern­ment.
“I don’t think this is very dan­ger­ous,” he said, but added that elec­tions aren’t sched­uled until 2009 and that’s too long to wait for the pro-Syrian bloc. “Why should we wait when we don’t have any power in the gov­ern­ment?” he asked.
He played down the pos­si­bil­i­ties of street protests, which have been effec­tive weapons for Hezbol­lah in the past. “Maybe it will come later,” he said.
But with these lat­est devel­op­ments, Lebanon has found itself back in an unwel­come role: as a bat­tle­field for regional and global pow­ers to play out their con­flicts. With Iran and Syria back­ing Hezbol­lah and its allies, and the U.S. and the West back­ing the Sin­iora gov­ern­ment, Lebanon’s polit­i­cal cri­sis is a another bat­tle in the new cold war shap­ing up between Iran and the United States for dom­i­nance in South­west Asia and its oil.

*Per­sonal obser­va­tions:*
The feel­ing here is one of ner­vous ten­sion among the Sun­nis and the anti-Syrian Chris­tians (mainly Samir Geagea’s Lebanese Forces) and con­fi­dence among the Shi’ites and their allies, includ­ing the Chris­t­ian Michel Aoun. (He really wants to be pres­i­dent and sees an alliance with Hezbol­lah as the way to get there.)
Ulti­mately, how­ever, this is a proxy bat­tle in the cur­rent tus­sle between the U.S.-Western alliance, which includes Europe, Israel and the United States, and an Iranian-Syrian-Hezbollah-Hamas axis. This is an idea I’ve been pro­mot­ing for most of 2006. The idea was sparked by the May _contretemps_ between Hezbol­lah and Israel fol­low­ing the assas­si­na­tion of two Islamic Jihad mem­bers in Saida and a cou­ple of Katyushas got tossed at Israel in retal­i­a­tion. The Jew­ish state responded harshly, with air raids across the south, caus­ing Hezbol­lah to counter-strike.
I said at the time, “Iran’s activ­i­ties in Lebanon are part of its larger plans for the region. By work­ing through and with local Shi­ite com­mu­ni­ties, which are found in Bahrain, Iraq, east­ern Saudi Ara­bia and stretch­ing through Syria to Lebanon and Israel’s north­ern fron­tier, Tehran is well on its way to cre­at­ing a ‘Shi­ite Crescent’ — a regional axis that allows it to hold most of the cards in any con­fronta­tion with the United States or Israel. And nowhere else, with the pos­si­ble excep­tion of Iraq, is Iran so well posi­tioned as in Lebanon.“
The May con­fronta­tion set­tled down after a day. But obvi­ously ten­sions remained — until they finally boiled over July 12, when the Shi’ite mil­i­tant group cap­tured two Israeli sol­diers and sparked a 34-day war that killed more than 1,200 peo­ple and left up to 4,000 wounded. Lebanon was dev­as­tated by the Israeli air force, but Hezbol­lah emerged polit­i­cally stronger.
Since then, they’ve been flex­ing their mus­cles and try­ing to force their way into posi­tion in the cab­i­net that would give them the veto over any deci­sions — a recipe for gov­ern­men­tal grid­lock that would main­tain their free­dom to do what they please in the south with­out inter­fer­ence from the U.S.-backed Sin­iora government.

Muted reaction to mid-terms in Lebanon

BEIRUT — Reac­tion to the Amer­i­can mid-terms was muted in Beirut, a city still shell-shocked from the sum­mer war with Israel and con­sumed by its own domes­tic polit­i­cal drama.
Much of Lebanon’s atten­tion is focused not on Amer­i­can pol­i­tics, but its own, which are dom­i­nated by round­table talks tak­ing place this week among the country’s pow­er­ful feu­dal lords who pre­side over their own sec­tar­ian fief­doms.
“The Lebanese are read­ing the tea leaves as best they can,” said Paul Salem, the direc­tor of the Mid­dle East Cen­ter for the Carnegie Endow­ment for Inter­na­tional Peace, based in Beirut. “The (anti-Syrian) March 14 move­ment is fear­ing the loss of U.S. power and the other side is rel­ish­ing the loss of US power.“
The “other side” is the pro-Syrian coali­tion made up of Hezbol­lah and its allies, which include the Free Patri­otic Move­ment led by Maronite Chris­t­ian Michel Aoun and a num­ber of smaller par­ties. The round­table talks are aimed at bang­ing out a com­pro­mise on expand­ing the cur­rent gov­ern­ment, a Hezbol­lah demand fol­low­ing the July-August war and its self-proclaimed “Divine Vic­tory.“
The United States “will con­tinue to back the March 14 gov­ern­ment and the Sin­iora gov­ern­ment,” Salem said. “That won’t change because both Democ­rats and Repub­li­cans agree on that.“
All across down­town, the com­mer­cial heart of Beirut, most peo­ple met the news that vot­ers had deliv­ered a sharp rebuke to Pres­i­dent Bush with either blank stares or shrugs, despite wide­spread dis­like for the administration’s poli­cies and what is seen as unques­tion­ing sup­port for Israel. But among the Lebanese and expats who kept an eye on the elec­tions, there was a pal­pa­ble sense of sat­is­fac­tion that the GOP had lost.
“The Democ­rats won so the author­ity can change in the U.S.,” said one man puff­ing on a water­pipe who declined to give his name. “There should be changes. There is not one region in the world that is com­fort­able with cur­rent Amer­i­can poli­cies.“
Another man, Gabriel Abou Daher, 32, a tele­vi­sion pro­ducer for a Beirut adver­tis­ing agency, said he had been fol­low­ing the elec­tions “closely” and was pleased with the results.
“It’s a mes­sage to Pres­i­dent Bush over his inter­na­tional poli­cies,” he said. “Maybe he will take another look at them.“
As for Lebanon, how­ever, he is not expect­ing any­thing dif­fer­ent. “We have seen both par­ties have the same pol­icy regard­ing Israel,” Abou Daher said.
Oth­ers thought the Democ­rats would be even more pro-Israel.
“I get some sat­is­fac­tion from see­ing Bush get slapped in the face, but I don’t take any com­fort in it,” said Marc Sirois, a Cana­dian and the man­ag­ing edi­tor for the English-language Daily Star news­pa­per. “The Democ­rats are more depen­dent on the pro-Israeli lobby for cam­paign funds and to get out the vote than the Repub­li­cans are.“
He also cau­tioned that Bush still had two years left in his term and he still has all the pow­ers of the com­man­der in chief “to do what­ever he wants.“
“The only thing they (Con­gress) could do is cut the purse strings in Iraq,” he said.