Latest IraqSlogger: Chalabi’s back

My lat­est for IraqS­log­ger is up, and there’s a howler of an op-ed in today’s _Wall Street Journal_. As I wrote for the Slogger:

Melik Kay­lan writes a fawn­ing piece on Ahmad Cha­l­abi for the _Wall Street Journal_’s op-ed page, call­ing him the “near­est thing Iraqis cur­rently pos­sess to a gen­uine walk-and-talk demo­c­ra­tic politi­cian.” For many Amer­i­cans, that may be hard to stom­ach, as the guy has been roundly crit­i­cized for ped­dling false WMD infor­ma­tion to eager lis­ten­ers at the Pen­ta­gon. (He once said, “As far as we’re con­cerned we’ve been entirely suc­cess­ful. That tyrant Sad­dam is gone and the Amer­i­cans are in Bagh­dad. What was said before is not impor­tant. … We are heroes in error.”) In Chalabi’s views, every­thing would have been hunky-dory in Bagh­dad if the Amer­i­cans had just let the Iraqis run the show, pre­sum­ably with him in charge. (Which was pretty much the plan until those med­dlin’ State Depart­ment kids showed up.) Fur­ther­more, with­out once men­tion­ing that Cha­l­abi is Shi’ite him­self, Kay­lan says Cha­l­abi rec­og­nizes the real­i­ties of Iraq and its eth­nic makeup, admit­ting that Shi’ites will be dom­i­nant. Well, other than Sunni insur­gents, does any­one really dis­pute that? Kay­lan seems to have been snook­ered by Cha­l­abi, who thrills Iraqis by wan­der­ing amongst the peo­ple. Admirable yes, but Cha­l­abi has almost zero sup­port in Iraq and per­haps the rea­son he’s able to walk and talk rel­a­tively safely in pub­lic is because no one takes him seri­ously anymore.

The quote from Cha­l­abi that I ref­er­ence can be found here, way back from Feb­ru­ary 2004.

Failure to Communicate

A for­mer trans­la­tor in Iraq, Dustin Lan­gan, wrote me today to tip me off about an inter­est­ing read in _Radar_, about the lack of good trans­la­tors in Iraq. He was recruited by MZM Inc., one of the com­pa­nies con­nected with the “Duke” Cun­ning­ham cor­rup­tion scan­dal, to work in Iraq from 2003 to 2004, and he has some good points to make.
One that is per­son­ally dear to me is the treat­ment of the Iraqi trans­la­tors. As he says:

[Iraqi trans­la­tors] have been treated ter­ri­bly. They’ve been killed. They have not been pro­tected. They have not received visas or any­thing. They’re being killed at very high rates. The result is many peo­ple now in Iraq think if you work with the coali­tion you’re an idiot, because you’re work­ing with some­one who doesn’t care about you, and then you’re killed.

I’ve known a few ‘terps, as they’re called, and my friend George Packer has made this “one of his major concerns”:http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20061127&s=packer112706. It should be one that makes every feel­ing Amer­i­can — whether you sup­ported the war or not — ashamed at how we’re treat­ing these peo­ple.
Any­way, it’s a good inter­view. Thanks for the tip, Dustin!

Horrors of war linger…

BEIRUT — Thought you might like to see a por­trait of the south I did for the Newark Star-Ledger. I have to say I was very pleased with the edit­ing process and these guys gave great play for a story that I would have thought most Amer­i­can media were no longer fol­low­ing much.

HORRORS OF WAR LINGER IN LEBANON

MAROUAHINE, Lebanon — For 34 days this sum­mer, the Israeli and Hezbol­lah rock­ets and mor­tars whis­tled through the lit­tle vil­lages like this one all across South­ern Lebanon. More than 1,000 peo­ple, includ­ing many Lebanese women and chil­dren, were killed. Far­ther north, con­crete cities were flat­tened. And then, the war ended on Aug. 14.
Or did it?
Nearly two months after a frag­ile cease-fire was announced and nine days after Israeli promised it had with­drawn the last of its troops from Lebanon, cit­i­zens in these south­ern vil­lages are skep­ti­cal. And angry.

You will have to enter some demo­graphic infor­ma­tion to see the whole story, but it’s not too odi­ous a require­ment.

Tech­no­rati Tags: , , , , ,

War’s Deadly Aftermath

cluster_bomb.jpg
An unex­ploded clus­ter bomb lies in a field near a pri­vate house in Majd es-Slim, south­ern Lebanon. It’s about the size of a D-cell bat­tery.
© 2006 Chris Allbrit­ton, all rights reserved.
MAJD ES-SLIM, South­ern Lebanon — Ali Herz didn’t think he had any­thing to worry about when he went to check on his neighbor’s house in the south­ern town of Majd es-Slim. After all, the cease-fire between Hezbol­lah and Israel was two days old and it seemed to be hold­ing.
But as he pushed open the heavy black iron gate to enter the gar­den that morn­ing, some­thing hap­pened. A sharp explo­sion threw him back­ward as shrap­nel pep­pered his legs, face and chest. Con­scious but in pain, he started to cry out for help to any­one in the area.
“I thought that my legs might have been cut off and I felt some­thing had been knocked out of my mouth,” he said almost a month later as he sat in his par­ents’ home. He suf­fered a wound to his head and he couldn’t open his eyes, “because of the blood.“
Herz, 26, a mechanic, had stum­bled across what may be the biggest dan­ger fac­ing res­i­dents of south­ern Lebanon now that the war is over: unex­ploded clus­ter bombs. Accord­ing to the United Nations Mine Action Coor­di­na­tion Cen­tre South­ern Lebanon (MACCSL), there are up to 1 mil­lion of the tiny but deadly unex­ploded muni­tions lit­ter­ing the south, many of them Amer­i­can made. Herz was one of the lucky ones. As of Sept. 21, in addi­tion to Herz, 89 peo­ple have been wounded, and 14 killed, accord­ing to cen­ter spokes­woman Dalya Far­ran in Tyre, the head­quar­ters for the cen­ter.
Clus­ter bombs work by launch­ing a con­tainer of sub-munitions or “bomblets” against a tar­get. When the container-which can be deliv­ered either via air­plane, artillery or rocket-bursts open in air, dozens or hun­dreds of smaller sub-munitions are scat­tered over a wide area. A rib­bon attached to the arm­ing pin deploys, both sta­bi­liz­ing the bomblet and arm­ing it. When it strikes the ground, the trig­ger slams into the det­o­na­tor like a fir­ing pin on a pis­tol, caus­ing the bomblet to explode. In some cases, a shaped charge in the bot­tom, like a minia­ture ver­sion of what is found in the IEDs in Iraq, increases the lethal­ity of the bomblet.
Most of the clus­ter bomblets iden­ti­fied so far have been Amer­i­can made, Far­ran said. The muni­tions include Amer­i­can m42s, m77s, m85s and Chinese-made MZD-2s. Some of the m85 muni­tions are Israeli copies of Amer­i­can designs, she added, but she wasn’t sure of the num­bers.
A spokesman for the Israeli Defense Forces said, when asked to com­ment on Israeli use of clus­ter bombs, “All the weapons and muni­tions used by the IDF are legal under inter­na­tional law and their use con­forms with inter­na­tional stan­dards.“
He declined to com­ment fur­ther.
Although there is no inter­na­tional ban on clus­ter weapons in gen­eral, the United States has strict rules about the use of its clus­ter muni­tions against civil­ian tar­gets as laid out by the Arms Export Con­trol Act. Addi­tion­ally, the U.S. and Israel report­edly have secret agree­ments about their use, accord­ing to a report in the New York Times. The State Depart­ment has opened an inves­ti­ga­tion into whether the use of clus­ter bombs by the Israelis vio­lates either the AECA or the secret agree­ments.
“What we’re doing is seek­ing more infor­ma­tion regard­ing alleged improper use of clus­ter muni­tions by the Israelis,” said Nancy Beck, a depart­ment spokes­woman. “Based on the infor­ma­tion that we gather we will take appro­pri­ate mea­sures, if required by the Arms Export Con­trol Act.“
The IDF spokesman also declined to com­ment about the State Depart­ment inves­ti­ga­tion.
While the inves­ti­ga­tion is ongo­ing, a ship­ment of M-26 artillery rockets-cluster weapons-has been held up, accord­ing to the New York Times.
Since 1976, Israel has been the sin­gle biggest recip­i­ent of Amer­i­can for­eign aid, accord­ing to the World Pol­icy Insti­tute in New York. From 2001 – 2005, Israel received $10.5 bil­lion in For­eign Mil­i­tary Financ­ing– con­gres­sion­ally appro­pri­ated grants given to for­eign gov­ern­ments to finance the pur­chase of American-made weapons, ser­vices and training-and $6.3 bil­lion worth of direct U.S. arms sales.
“Being able to pur­chase arms from the United States, at least under U.S. law, is not a right,” said another State Depart­ment offi­cial who requested anonymity in order to dis­cuss the inves­ti­ga­tion. “If we find that that these weapons are not used for the appro­pri­ate pur­poses, the U.S. may decide not to sell or pro­vide weapons in the future.“
In 1982, Con­gress cut off the sale of clus­ter bombs to Israel, fol­low­ing an inquiry that showed they had been improp­erly used against civil­ian tar­gets in Israel’s inva­sion of Lebanon that year. Pres­i­dent Rea­gan lifted the ban six years later.
It was these mines and unex­ploded muni­tions left over from the Israeli inva­sions of 1978 and 1982, as well as those planted by var­i­ous war­ring fac­tions in Lebanon’s 1975 – 1990 civil war, that MACCSL was formed to deal with. “But after the war, we dis­cov­ered we had a huge prob­lem with clus­ter bombs,” said the U.N.‘s Far­ran.
Despite the IDF’s offi­cial state­ment, there are signs that some within the Israeli mil­i­tary estab­lish­ment have had sec­ond thoughts about the use of the weapons. In an arti­cle in Ha’aretz, Israel’s lead­ing left-leaning daily news­pa­per, an unnamed com­man­der in the IDF’s MLRS (Mul­ti­ple Launch Rocket Sys­tem) unit expressed regret at the use of the clus­ter bombs.
“In Lebanon, we cov­ered entire vil­lages with clus­ter bombs,” the com­man­der is quoted as say­ing. “What we did there was crazy and mon­strous.“
In the clos­ing days of the war, he said, his unit launched up to 1,800 clus­ter rock­ets into south­ern Lebanon con­tain­ing up to 1.2 mil­lion bomblets. The U.N. also esti­mates that another 32,000 artillery shells with clus­ter muni­tions were fired, adding more unex­ploded bomblets to the area. An unknown num­ber of clus­ter bombs were dropped from the air. Far­ran saiid more than 1 mil­lion unex­ploded bomblets could still be on the ground.
And that’s one of the main prob­lems. No one is really sure just how many strikes there were — “Each day the new tar­gets are adding up,” said Far­ran.
As of Sept. 26, sur­vey and emer­gency ord­nance dis­posal teams had found 590 con­firmed clus­ter bomb strikes, she said. A sin­gle strike could be one attack on a house or a vil­lage or area.
The offi­cial fail­ure rate of the bomblets is 10 per­cent, said Far­ran, which means that 1 in 10 bomblets will fail to explode on impact but remain armed. How­ever, she said the sur­vey and emer­gency ord­nance dis­posal teams had found that almost 40 per­cent of the recov­ered bomblets had failed. Tak­ing the num­bers from the IDF, that means there are still up to 480,000 unex­ploded bomblets from the IDF’s rock­ets, she said. And that doesn’t include clus­ter bombs dropped from air­planes or fired from artillery.
Those on the ground doing the dan­ger­ous job of clear­ing the bomblets agree.
“I’ve never seen so much like this,” said Mag­nus Bengts­son, the super­vi­sor on an EOD team clear­ing clus­ter bomblets from a neigh­bor­hood in the small town of Hanaouay, 5.5 miles south­east of Tyre and eight miles from the Israeli bor­der. “It’s more than I expected.“
Bengts­son and his team are with the Swedish Res­cue Ser­vices Agency, a group the UN con­tracted for mine clear­ing but which has been pressed into ser­vice to help with the imme­di­ate dan­ger. As he walked through an empty field the size of a soc­cer pitch, Bengts­son pointed to a small, D cell-battery sized object on the ground. It’s an American-made m77, he said, which is designed to take out both peo­ple and armored vehi­cles, includ­ing tanks. The shaped charge can pen­e­trate up to 5 inches of armor, and the cas­ing is scored so it sends out deadly shrap­nel to a radius of about 20 feet.
Bengts­son and other groups tasked by the MACCSL with col­lect­ing and dis­pos­ing of the unex­ploded muni­tions are con­cen­trat­ing on the roads and homes in the affected vil­lages right now. After that, they will start a phase known as bat­tle area clear­ance (BAC) that will attempt to clear all the bomblets from the agri­cul­tural fields through­out the entire south. It’s a job the UN hopes will be com­pleted by the end of 2007.
There is no blan­ket ban on clus­ter muni­tions, but the Geneva Con­ven­tions for­bid their use against civil­ian tar­gets. When asked if he had seen any evi­dence that Hezbol­lah had been fir­ing Katyusha rock­ets from Hanaouay and draw­ing Israeli fire, Bengts­son, who served in the Swedish army in Bosnia, Kosovo and Iraq as a demo­li­tions expert, shook his head no.
Res­i­dents of the south are grate­ful to the UN and its EOD teams, but they worry that a delay in get­ting to all the bomblets will lead to the loss of tobacco and olive har­vests, the main­stay crops of the south.
“We hope they can clear the fields because we rely on them,” said Ali’s mother, Mariam Herz. “We lost the sea­son for the tobacco … and we had a few cows that were killed.“
Today, Ali Herz walks slowly with a limp, and when he shows his legs and chest, the shrap­nel wounds are so numer­ous he looks like he suf­fers from chicken pox. He still has two pieces of shrap­nel in his left thigh, he said, and he has to put cush­ions between his knees in order to sleep. He can­not work because he has to get under cars, some­thing his injuries pre­vent him from doing.
Still, he wor­ries about oth­ers and the remain­ing bombs. “After I hear an explo­sion,” he said, “I want to go and see if anyone’s been hurt because I don’t want any­one to go through what I’ve been through.”

© 2006 Chris Allbrit­ton All Rights Reserved.

NOTE: If you’d like to reprint this in your pub­li­ca­tion, please con­tact me for nego­ti­a­tion of fees. If you’d like to donate, please hit the link below or to the right.

Tech­no­rati Tags: , , , , ,

Hard at work

BEIRUT — Sorry for the radio silence. I’ve been hard at work on a story about Iran­ian influ­ence in Lebanon and what it means for the region, and I’ve not had much time to blog.
But this “new rec­on­cil­i­a­tion plan from Maliki”:http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Iraq.html is inter­est­ing, to say the least. Pos­si­ble amnesty for killers of U.S. troops? No firm time-table for with­drawal, but Casey says “sig­nif­i­cant troop reduc­tions by end of 2007″:http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/25/world/middleeast/25military.html. It will be very inter­est­ing to see how this plays out in Amer­i­can domes­tic pol­i­tics. It seems, at first blush, to hand the Democ­rats much of what they’re ask­ing for (conditions-based plan for rede­ploy­ment), but it also seems to take away the Repub­li­cans’ and George Bush’s “Dems are ‘cut-and-runners’” card. I sus­pect the GOP will do an about face, say it’s what they wanted all along and run with it.
At least, that would be the smart thing to do. What remains to be seen is whether the Sunni insur­gents will buy into this. I have a feel­ing a good por­tion will, although how sig­nif­i­cant that por­tion will be is unclear. “To those who want to rebuild our coun­try, we present an olive branch … And to those who insist on killing and ter­ror­ism, we present a fist with the power of law to pro­tect our coun­try and peo­ple,” Maliki told Par­lia­ment.
This deal has been in the works for a long time, since Novem­ber 2004, actu­ally. Michael Ware of TIME, now CNN, reported on the secret nego­ti­a­tions between the Ba’athists and the then-Allawi gov­ern­ment and the U.S. mil­i­tary com­man­ders. If Maliki is announc­ing this, there’s a fair chance that most of the kinks have been ironed out. You don’t drop this on a war-weary pub­lic if it doesn’t have a fair chance of work­ing.
This is a sketchy entry, I know, but more on this later… Dis­cuss amongst your­selves if you wish.