The latest silly article on Iran…

Aside

Pos­si­bly one of the most ridicu­lous arti­cles I’ve read in a while: Why Iran’s Top Lead­ers Believe That The End Of Days Has Come | Fox News.

Yeah, I know. “Fox News”, right? But one of the rea­sons Iran is so mys­te­ri­ous is because US and other west­ern lead­ers don’t know what the regime’s lead­er­ship is think­ing, much less that they’re obsessed with the “end times.”

Latest IraqSlogger: Chalabi’s back

My lat­est for IraqS­log­ger is up, and there’s a howler of an op-ed in today’s _Wall Street Journal_. As I wrote for the Slogger:

Melik Kay­lan writes a fawn­ing piece on Ahmad Cha­l­abi for the _Wall Street Journal_’s op-ed page, call­ing him the “near­est thing Iraqis cur­rently pos­sess to a gen­uine walk-and-talk demo­c­ra­tic politi­cian.” For many Amer­i­cans, that may be hard to stom­ach, as the guy has been roundly crit­i­cized for ped­dling false WMD infor­ma­tion to eager lis­ten­ers at the Pen­ta­gon. (He once said, “As far as we’re con­cerned we’ve been entirely suc­cess­ful. That tyrant Sad­dam is gone and the Amer­i­cans are in Bagh­dad. What was said before is not impor­tant. … We are heroes in error.”) In Chalabi’s views, every­thing would have been hunky-dory in Bagh­dad if the Amer­i­cans had just let the Iraqis run the show, pre­sum­ably with him in charge. (Which was pretty much the plan until those med­dlin’ State Depart­ment kids showed up.) Fur­ther­more, with­out once men­tion­ing that Cha­l­abi is Shi’ite him­self, Kay­lan says Cha­l­abi rec­og­nizes the real­i­ties of Iraq and its eth­nic makeup, admit­ting that Shi’ites will be dom­i­nant. Well, other than Sunni insur­gents, does any­one really dis­pute that? Kay­lan seems to have been snook­ered by Cha­l­abi, who thrills Iraqis by wan­der­ing amongst the peo­ple. Admirable yes, but Cha­l­abi has almost zero sup­port in Iraq and per­haps the rea­son he’s able to walk and talk rel­a­tively safely in pub­lic is because no one takes him seri­ously anymore.

The quote from Cha­l­abi that I ref­er­ence can be found here, way back from Feb­ru­ary 2004.

Escape from Iraq

A story I wrote appeared Mon­day in the Newark Star-Ledger, a great smaller paper that cares about for­eign news. The story dealt with the plight of the Iraqi refugees in Jordan.

Lives sus­pended by war
AMMAN, Jor­dan — Rana crosses her legs on the thread­bare car­pet in her liv­ing room in this poor Pales­tin­ian sec­tion of town and watches as her three chil­dren light a can­dle. The kids are hav­ing a pre­tend birth­day party with­out a cake or presents, but their faces are painted a mag­nif­i­cent shade of gold by the candlelight.

Across town, Hasa and his fam­ily sit in their richly-appointed apart­ment, with all the mod­ern con­ve­niences and bed­rooms for every­one. The kitchen is espe­cially bright and clean.

Rana and Hasa live in sep­a­rate worlds, but have much in common.

Both fam­i­lies are Iraqi refugees fac­ing an uncer­tain future in a for­eign coun­try. Both want to return to their shat­tered coun­try. And both agreed to be inter­viewed and pho­tographed for this story only if their real names would not be used because they fear depor­ta­tion from Jor­dan and ret­ri­bu­tion in Iraq.
Dri­ven from their homes by vio­lence and threats of death, Rana and Hasa also pro­vide rare por­traits of the refugee life fac­ing many Iraqis. The two fam­i­lies are among the 750,000 Iraqi refugees esti­mated to be liv­ing in Jor­dan, a coun­try about the size of Penn­syl­va­nia and chok­ing on the stag­ger­ing bur­den of its new pop­u­la­tion. (The Iraqis account for about 15 per­cent of the peo­ple liv­ing in Jordan.)

Rana’s fam­ily is strug­gling to fit in and faces dis­crim­i­na­tion from other Iraqis, Jor­da­ni­ans and Pales­tini­ans. Jor­da­ni­ans, Rana says, com­plain to her that “you’re not wear­ing a hijab, you’re wear­ing tight jeans, you’re leav­ing the house.” Pales­tini­ans, mean­while, say, “You killed Sad­dam.”
Hasa’s fam­ily, while well off, faces dif­fi­cult cir­cum­stances as well. From their plush perch over­look­ing the local mosque, they made a com­fort­able life here after arriv­ing in 2003.

Things have changed, though.

Hasa now com­plains gov­ern­ment reg­u­la­tions make it impos­si­ble for him to run his busi­nesses here or in Iraq, and his life sav­ings is being bled dry.
At the same time, he rages at the U.S. government.

We are in such a state that we who wel­comed Amer­ica now hate it, and hate the peo­ple as much as we hate the pol­i­tics,” he says. “This isn’t the free­dom we expected. This isn’t what we wanted.”

Two fam­i­lies in a coun­try where they don’t want to be.

Two fam­i­lies in a coun­try that really doesn’t want them.

Please read the whole thing”:http://www.nj.com/starledger/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-11/1180932323248120.xml&coll=1. It should be noted that two days after the story appeared, the UNHCR raised the num­ber of Iraqis who are dis­placed or refugees to 4.4 mil­lion — almost twice the num­bers that were avail­able to me at the time of my report­ing. That’s 16 per­cent of the entire Iraqi pop­u­la­tion, mak­ing it the largest human cat­a­stro­phe to hit the Mid­dle East in recorded his­tory. It dwarfs the Pales­tin­ian dis­place­ments in 1948 and 1967. If some­thing isn’t done about this, it will fur­ther desta­bi­lize an already volatile region.

By the way, can some­one rec­om­mend a good server host? Yahoo! is ter­ri­ble and I keep get­ting 500 Server Errors pre­vent­ing me from get­ting into the blog, rebuild­ing it, etc.

Two buses blown up in Christian area

BEIRUT — Bombs destroyed two com­muter buses today in the small Chris­t­ian com­mu­nity of Ain Alaq, in the moun­tains north of Beirut.
Reports of fatal­i­ties var­ied, but ranged from three (Red Cross, secu­rity forces) to 12 (LBC and other media sources.) Ten to 20 were wounded. The first bomb was appar­ently attached to the under­car­riage of the first bus while the sec­ond was in a back seat on the sec­ond, accord­ing to my fixer, who is try­ing to find more info. I’ll update if this changes.
The wounded were civil­ians pos­si­bly trav­el­ing to work, mark­ing a change in the “two-year cam­paign of bomb­ings and assassinations”:http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L13582123.htm that has wracked Lebanon since the killing of Rafik Hariri on Feb. 14, 2005. Before, the attacks were either tar­geted assas­si­na­tions of well-known anti-Syrian politi­cians and jour­nal­ists or small bombs exploded in build­ings late at night so as to min­i­mize casu­al­ties. This seems aimed at Iraq– or Israel-style ter­ror. Ran­dom, any­where, piti­less.
Details are still emerg­ing, but spec­u­la­tion is ram­pant. Was this Syria? Hezbol­lah? CIA? (A Hezbol­lah spokesman said it was the lat­ter.) Was it a warn­ing to the March 14 coali­tion not to attend the big rally planned for down­town tomor­row to mark the two-year anniver­sary of Hariri’s death?
One intrigu­ing con­nec­tion is to Elias Murr, Lebanon’s defense min­is­ter. The buses orig­i­nated in Bteghrin, the home of the Murr fam­ily — they’re the major clan there — and some have won­dered if this could be a response to Murr’s “refusal last week to return a truck full of Hezbol­lah weapons”:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6345761.stm inter­cepted by the Lebanese Army?
Elias Murr was the tar­get of a failed assas­si­na­tion in July 2005.
I’m not con­vinced of that, as it would be a com­plete turn-around for Hezbol­lah, who have not (yet) turned their weapons on their fel­low Lebanese — a point of pride for the group.
Also, the attack hap­pened near Bik­faya, the ances­tral home of the Gemayel clan. Sev­eral of the dead were Gemayels. Lebanon’s indus­try min­is­ter, Pierre Gemayel “was assassinated”:http://www.back-to-iraq.com/archives/2006/11/pierre_gemayel_has_been_assass.php in Novem­ber.
Michel Murr, the defense minister’s father, was at the site of the bomb­ing and said it was a mes­sage for all Lebanese to come together and tran­scend pol­i­tics. That’s a nice sen­ti­ment, but it’s almost assuredly _not_ the mes­sage the bombers were try­ing to send.
More likely, it was a warn­ing to March 14.
“They are try­ing to sab­o­tage tomorrow’s meet­ing,” said Ahmad Fat­fat, the for­mer inte­rior min­is­ter. “They are try­ing to divide the Chris­tians. … The peo­ple who are doing this don’t want the peo­ple to come together and it’s another link in the chain” of assas­si­na­tions.
“I can­not believe any Lebanese is capa­ble of doing such a ter­ri­ble thing,” he added.
Fat­fat also said the bombs were placed on the buses yes­ter­day, although he declined to say how he knew that.
Obvi­ously, Fat­fat is not-so-subtlely point­ing the fin­ger at Syria. A Hezbol­lah spokesman said the same thing, but blamed the CIA instead of Syria.
I wit­nessed this in Iraq, too, by the way, early in the insur­gency. In 2004, when the vio­lence was much more spo­radic and rare than it is now, Iraqis would often tell me, “These bombs could not come from Iraqis. No Iraqi would hurt another Iraqi. This must be the Israelis or CIA.“
There’s always a nat­ural ten­dency to believe that out­siders are the ones doing the killing. Wit­ness the imme­di­ate reac­tion to the Mur­rah Build­ing in 1995. Every­one imme­di­ately sus­pected Arab ter­ror­ism, not home-grown white suprema­cists.
But right now, espe­cially on the eve of the anniver­sary of the killing of Hariri, every­one in Lebanon — Hezbol­lah, March 14, etc. — is bank­ing on national unity for their own pur­poses. “Hariri was for all of us,” as many say. Other par­ties — Syria, espe­cially, but pos­si­bly Israel — would love to see Lebanese at each oth­ers’ throats. Syria could use any vio­lence as an “I told you so” excuse to inter­vene again, and Israel prob­a­bly wouldn’t mind see­ing Hezbol­lah on the defen­sive in its own coun­try.
(Mind you, I’m not accus­ing Israel of today’s bomb­ing; I’m just ana­lyz­ing who might stand to gain from Lebanese dis­cord.)
*UNRELATED (?) NEWS:* The Grand Mufti of Lebanon, Sheikh Moham­mad Rashid Qab­bani, the high­est rank­ing Sunni cleric in coun­try, claims in a press release to LBC that he was heck­led and threat­ened by the pro-Syrian, Hezbollah-led March 8 pro­test­ers as he led prayers at Hariri’s grave in Martyr’s Square down­town today. He says he was told to leave or they would burn his car.
(March 8 is a coali­tion of mostly Shi’ite par­ties and some Chris­tians, and includes Hezbol­lah, Amal, the Syr­ian Social Nation­al­ist Party and the Chris­t­ian par­ties of Michel Aoun and Suleiman Fran­jieh. With the excep­tion of Aoun, they are all solidly pro-Syrian. Aoun just wants to be pres­i­dent and will hitch his horse to whichever wagon he thinks will win.)
Also, in this morning’s _San Fran­cisco Chronicle_, I have a story about the “rearm­ing of the Lebanese factions.”:http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/02/13/MNG62O3F5U1.DTL&hw=allbritton&sn=001&sc=1000 It might become very rel­e­vant after today.

Beirut in flames

hard_days_work.jpg
An oppo­si­tion mem­ber cra­dles the head of an exhausted com­rade as they take a break from block­ing roads in Beirut on Tues­day © 2007 Christo­pher Allbrit­ton
BEIRUT — If there was any ques­tion whether Hezbol­lah was in con­trol of the sit­u­a­tion here fol­low­ing the vio­lence of Tues­day, the fight­ing today should con­vince those that it is not, and the sit­u­a­tion is about to be seri­ously out of con­trol.
To back up a lit­tle, Tuesday’s vio­lence seemed to shock even the lead­ers of Hezbol­lah, both because its Aounists and Amal allies behaved like hooli­gans, but also because the fol­low­ers of Saad Hariri and Samir Geagea refused to back down and matched slo­gan with slo­gan, stick with stick, stone with stone.
At one neigh­bor­hood in Beirut, where the fight­ing was fiercest, the largely Sunni sup­port­ers of al-Mustaqbal chanted their sup­port for Amer­ica (in response to the chants of “Iran! Iran!” and “Bashar! Syria!” by Amal sup­port­ers across the street.) They also, bizarrely, hoisted a poster of Sad­dam Hus­sein, indi­cat­ing that the Sunni-Shi’a con­flict from Iraq has poi­soned the atmos­phere in Lebanon now, too.
This is about to be a full-on sec­tar­ian clash between Sun­nis and Shi’a and within the Chris­t­ian com­mu­nity.
That’s why Hezbol­lah and its allies called off their strike after a day, despite many promises by the men on the street I saw who said they would con­tinue the strike “for days,” if nec­es­sary.
“Do you not think Hezbol­lah loves Lebanon?” asked Bilal, a Hezbol­lah sup­porter I spoke with as his com­pa­tri­ots burned a car to block the road lead­ing the air­port. “Of course we do, which is why we are pre­pared to stay out here for days, weeks.“
More omi­nously, today’s vio­lence shows that Hezbol­lah no longer con­trols the oppo­si­tion move­ment it cre­ated. Months of ani­mos­ity over the war, the par­lia­men­tary paral­y­sis and calls for chang­ing the gov­ern­ment has hard­ened posi­tions among the Sunni, who increas­ingly see the Shi’a as respon­si­ble for last summer’s war and more loyal to Iran than to Lebanon. In short, the Shi’ite mil­i­tant group has pushed its polit­i­cal oppo­nents too far.
Already this has spread beyond the cap­i­tal. The Lebanese Army has been deployed to Chtoura and Baal­bak in the Bekaa and there are as yet uncon­firmed reports that the road to old road to Sidon has been closed. By whom, we don’t know.
Four peo­ple are dead and at least 25 injured and while this flare-up might be con­tained, the next one appears inevitable. And next time it won’t be fought with sticks and stones.