<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Back to Iraq &#187; Iraq</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/tag/iraq/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.back-to-iraq.com</link>
	<description>Back to Iraq &#124; Being a recounting of my journalistic ventures in Iraq</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:31:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Three car bombs in Baghdad</title>
		<link>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2005/10/three-car-bombs-in-baghdad.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2005/10/three-car-bombs-in-baghdad.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 18:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Allbritton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muqawama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://back-to-iraq.com/?p=557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are reports of a mortar attack and two large car bombs at the Sheraton Hotel, home of Fox News and, next door in the Palestine, the Associated Press.
 <a href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2005/10/three-car-bombs-in-baghdad.php">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BAGHDAD — There are reports of a mortar attack and two large car bombs at the Sheraton Hotel, home of Fox News and, next door in the Palestine, the Associated Press. There has been a third car bomb attack on the al-Sadeer Hotel up the road from me.<br />
[<b>UPDATE 10/24/05 6:03:43 PM:</b> Now it appears it’s three car bombs at the Palestine/Sheraton compound instead of mortars… No attack on al-Sadeer as near as I can tell. CNN’s footage is chilling; two smaller explosions in front of AP cameras on the Palestine Hotel, and then a third huge explosion. As you watch, you can see a <strike>tanker truck</strike> cement mixer enter the compound before exploding in a massive cloud of fire, dust and smoke.<br />
[This means they knew where the cameras are. They know how to get into the compound. And there’s a good chance the first two explosions were designed to get journalists’ attention, draw them to the windows and then explode the third one.<br />
[No good word on casulaties yet. Nothing reliable.]<br />
Things are confusing right now and we’re unsure what has happened, but that’s the latest. The blasts rattled my windows and I’m three or so kilometers away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2005/10/three-car-bombs-in-baghdad.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to Kurdistan</title>
		<link>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/11/welcome-to-kurdistan.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/11/welcome-to-kurdistan.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2002 19:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Allbritton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurdistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tigris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://back-to-iraq.com/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WHAT WAS HAPPENING: I had this picture taken as I stood on the shores of the Tigris after we had just crossed from Syria into northern Iraq. Downstream, about 2 km, I could see a tower from the Iraqi base &#8230; <a href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/11/welcome-to-kurdistan.php">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img alt="ImageWelcome to Kurdistan.jpg" src="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/archives/Files/ImageWelcome to Kurdistan.jpg" width="350" border="1" /></div>
<p><b>WHAT WAS HAPPENING:</b> I had this picture taken as I stood on the shores of the Tigris after we had just crossed from Syria into northern Iraq. Downstream, about 2 km, I could see a tower from the Iraqi base that commands the area. The Kurds told me that the Iraqis sometimes snipe at the families that use the crossing. (About 150 people cross a day, making it one of the more busy transit points between Syria and Iraq.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/11/welcome-to-kurdistan.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kuwait backs U.S. on ICC</title>
		<link>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/11/kuwait-backs-us-on-icc.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/11/kuwait-backs-us-on-icc.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2002 14:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Allbritton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Criminal Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kuwait]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://back-to-iraq.com/?p=43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In another indication that war seems inevitable, Kuwait has exempted American troops from prosecution by the Internationl Criminal Court. The agreement would exempt U.S. troops from war crimes while operating in Kuwaiti territory, which is convenient in its timing, to &#8230; <a href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/11/kuwait-backs-us-on-icc.php">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In another indication that war seems inevitable, Kuwait has <a title="Kuwait to Exempt U.S. on War Crimes" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/02/international/middleeast/02COUR.html">exempted American troops from prosecution by the Internationl Criminal Court</a>. The agreement would exempt U.S. troops from war crimes while operating in Kuwaiti territory, which is convenient in its timing, to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/11/kuwait-backs-us-on-icc.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. to pay Russia $10 billion for Iraq backing</title>
		<link>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/us-to-pay-russia-10-billion-for-iraq-backing.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/us-to-pay-russia-10-billion-for-iraq-backing.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Allbritton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al qa'ida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diego garcia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incirlik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saudi arabia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://back-to-iraq.com/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russia gets its money and Qatar survives a coup attempt. Americans hear none of this news.
 <a href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/us-to-pay-russia-10-billion-for-iraq-backing.php">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Careful readers will remember that I said that Russia was dragging its feet at the United Nations on America’s “kick Saddam’s ass” resolution because it was hoping for some guarantee that the $8 billion that Iraq owes Russia would be paid. Well, <a title="Russia-Iran Incentives (Taken Question)" href="http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2002/14590.htm">here is the reassurance</a>. In response to taken questions, a State department spokesperson said that Russia could be compensated for <i>more than</i> $10 billion if they stopped their nuclear cooperation with Iran and allowed their country to become a nuclear waste dump.<br />
<blockquote><cite>One example is the potential transfer to Russia for storage of spent reactor fuel currently held by third countries, much of which requires US approval for such transfer because the US originally supplied the fresh fuel to those countries. If the Russians end their sensitive cooperation with Iran, we have indicated we would be prepared to favorably consider such transfers, an arrangement potentially worth over $10 billion to Moscow.</cite></p></blockquote>
<p>This kind of deal will lead Russia to ultimately support the United States against Iraq.<br />
Also, some other news that hasn’t been widely reported here in the States: an <a href="http://arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Day/021016/2002101607.html">attempted coup in Qatar!</a> Who knew about this? Anyone? Anyone? Seems that American troops helped put down a coup attempt against Sheikh Hamad Bin Khaleifah al-Thani on Oct. 12. High ranking Qatari army officers were arrested and suspicion immediately fell on an Islamist organization and Pakistani and Yemini army recruits with alleged ties to Al Qa’ida.<br />
The is big. Relations with Saudi Arabia have cooled since Sept. 11, 2001, and Al Udeid Air Base outside of Doha is the best alternative. If Qatar were moved out of America’s camp, the United States would have to rely on Incirlik in Turkey and Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean to fly sorties against Iraqi targets. And most of the aircraft in the south would have to be carrier based, which would cut down on the number and frequency of sorties. It wouldn’t make an Iraqi operation impossible, but it would make it more difficult, I’ll wager.<br />
What’s most worrisome, from a Pentagon war planner’s point of view, is the potential loss of Qatar, the continued refusal of Saudi Arabia to allow the use of its air bases and troubling Al Qa’ida attacks in Kuwait. None of these things is crippling individually, but in a worst-case scenario, America’s entire southern front in a Second Gulf War could crumble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/us-to-pay-russia-10-billion-for-iraq-backing.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Turkey preparing to invade Kurdistan?</title>
		<link>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/turkey-preparing-to-invade-kurdistan.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/turkey-preparing-to-invade-kurdistan.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Allbritton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barzani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nationalist Movement Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talabani]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://back-to-iraq.com/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Turkey has been making noises that the Iraqi Kurds should not get too hopeful about establishing a quasi-independent entity in the three governates they control in northern Iraq. Now, it looks like Turkey is ready to back up their words with force. However, there is an election coming up in Turkey, so the possibility that this is all fodder for domestic constituencies cannot be ruled out.
 <a href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/turkey-preparing-to-invade-kurdistan.php">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turkey has been making noises that the Iraqi Kurds should not get too hopeful about establishing a quasi-independent entity in the three governates they control in northern Iraq. Now, it looks like Turkey is ready to back up their words with force. (At least they’re consistent.) However, there is an election coming up in Turkey, so the possibility that this is all fodder for domestic constituencies cannot be ruled out.<br />
On the they-really-mean-it side of the equation, ArabicNews.com is reporting that Turkish deputy prime minister Doulat Bahjali said that his country <a title="Turkey's concern about north Iraq" href="http://arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Day/021022/2002102212.html">must reconsider its stance</a> regarding northern Iraq. Since 1991 when it got dragged into Operation Provide Comfort (the allied establishment of the northern no-fly zone to protect Kurdish refugees from the 1990–91 Gulf War,) Turky has gone back and forth in its relations with the PUK and KDP. At times the relationship was warm enough that Barzani and Talabani, the leaders of the respective parties, traveled under Turkish diplomatic passports.<br />
That has apparently ended with finality after the  Kurdistan Regional Government convened its parliament in October and introduced a proposal for a federal republic of Iraq with a Kurdish entity in the north and with Kirkuk as its capital. Kirkuk, rich in oil and history is home to Kurds, Arabs, Assyrians and Turkomen, to whose defense Bahjali is leaping.<br />
“The pressures which are imposed on the Turkomen under Saddam Hussein were great and that they are at the meantime exposed to a new threat by the two Kurdish leaders Masoud al-Barazani and Jalal al-Talabani targeting their cities of Mosul, Kirkuk and Arbil,” ArabicNews.com says. <i>(Ed. I changed some spellings of towns in this quote.)</i><br />
This backs up the it’s-all-politics argument, since the Turkomen are a natural ally of Bahjali’s National Movement Party, and bashing the Kurds is always a surefire way to rally the nationalist faithful. <i>However</i>, Turkish defense minister Sbah Eddin Oglo said Oct. 14 that Turkey intends to <a href="http://www.arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Day/021015/2002101518.html">establish ‘a security belt’</a> in northern Iraq and that intelligence agencies have reported that Turkey has increased its troop strength in Iraqi Kurdistan from 4,000 to 10,000 troops.<br />
All of this must be driving the United States crazy. The last thing it needs is a Kurdish-Turkish dispute in northern Iraq just when it’s trying to get its ducks in a row should shooting start. And this is exactly the kind of chaos various pundits have predicted would happen if Saddam is removed and regional rivalries are allowed to flare. But wasn’t that supposed to happen <i>after</i> a war?<br />
Keep watching the Turks. They hold the key to all of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/turkey-preparing-to-invade-kurdistan.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eastward bound…</title>
		<link>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/eastward-bound.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/eastward-bound.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Allbritton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ceylan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discriminatin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Istanbul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turgut Ozal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://back-to-iraq.com/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being the second of my dispatches from Turkey, this time from Ankara... The call for prayer is echoing outside my window, I'm staying with Aykut and his wife and Iï¿½ve just seen on the news that the UN has failed to reach an agreement with Iraq on the return of arms inspectors and that the New York Times has published a front-page story outlining plans for a three-pronged attack on Iraq. ... I'll be there in a week.
 <a href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/eastward-bound.php">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">This is the second of my posts from Turkey, made after I arrived in Ankara. Prior to my arrival, I met with Turan Ceylan, the manager of the Inter-Continental Hotel in Istanbul. He’s a Kurdish success story, one of many in Istanbul where many Kurds have settled after the PKK troubles in the southeast during the 1980s and 1990s. I didn’t get much to get out of the interview, except that he is pro-EU (he’s a businessman) and he believes that discrimination against Kurds is blown way out of proportion by Western press (which is easy for him to say; he comes from a rich family that runs one of the largest construction firms in Turkey.)</span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">This was an attitude I discovered among many middle-class Istanbul residents. Aydin Kudu, my original fixer before he suffered a hip injury, had me over for dinner and during the post-prandial tea, he and Raia, his girlfriend and sometimes partner-guide, said the same thing: There is no discrimination in Turkey; Kurds can do whatever they like, as long as they don’t break any laws. </span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">On one level, they have a point. At least one president of Turkey, Turgut Ozal, has claimed Kurdish ancestry and Istanbul has seen a number of Kurds other than Ceylan rise to success in the businessworld. But there is a great deal of unknown truth in the statement that “Kurds can do whatever they like, as long as they don’t break any laws.” But until recently, it was illegal to be Kurdish. It was illegal to teach or sing in Kurdish. Yes, Kurds could succeed in Turkey, but only if they assimilated and acted Turkish. And even then, if someone’s ID card listed them as hailing from the southeast, they would often be greeted with suspicion and had a harder time finding jobs in the more cosmopolitan western part of the country. </span></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">At any rate, this gave me much to think about. So after a couple of days, I took a bus from Taksim in Istanbul where </span><a href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/archives/Files/aykut.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.back-to-iraq.com/archives/Files/aykut.html', 'popup', 'width=240,height=358,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">Aykut Uzun</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">, my fixer, met me. After five hours on the road in Turkey, I was glad to see him.</span></p>
<p><span id="more-25"></span></p>
<p><code>From: Christopher Allbritton <callbritton@mac.com></callbritton@mac.com></code></p>
<p><code><br />
</code>
<p><code>Date: Fri Jul 5, 2002 10:39:41 PM America/New_York</code></p>
</p>
<blockquote><p>The call for prayer is echoing outside my window, here in Ankara. The sun is slipping between the high-rise apartments in this former squatters’ ‘hood in which I’ve found myself. (Now, it’s expensive apartments owned by Ankara’s yuppie class.) I’m staying with Aykut and his wife, and I’ve just seen on the news that the UN has failed to reach an agreement with Iraq on the return of arms inspectors and that the NYTimes has published a front-page story outlining plans for a three-pronged attack on Iraq.
</p>
<p>Fucking hell. I’m going to be there in a week.</p>
<p>But, at last, it begins. The “failure” of the UN to reach an agreement will be the green light the US is looking for to begin assembling coalition forces to invade. I won’t be surprised to find a number of Americans in southeast Turkey, all with good posture and no hair.</p>
<p>This is most inconvenient. And just think, two days ago, I was walking along the Bosporus with Tuba, a pretty Turkish student who was helping me with the problems of administration at Bogaza’i University, buying grilled fish, freshly caught, from a boat bobbing along the rim of Europe and then sitting in a caf’ high on a hill watching the boats pass up and down between the Black Sea and the Sea of Mamara. </p>
<p>And it’s not just inconvenient for me. Aykut, my fixer, is in the tourism business, and he estimates that the rest of this year and most of next is shot to hell with the Americans running about and shooting things. War zones don’t attract tourists much. (And worse, the ones that do come don’t spend any money.) As we spoke his wife, Muhabbet, rubbed her forehead and looked worried. She’s a schoolteacher and together, they have a 5-year-old daughter, Zeynbe, to raise. If the tourism business falls off  —  again  —  then things will be very tight for them.</p>
<p>Now, we’re off to Diyarbakir on Sunday after we’ve had a chance to touch bases with the local Iraqi opposition groups in Ankara. Also, HADEP, the Kurdish party here in Turkey. They’re all made up of your usual suspects of leftists, radicals, ethnic nationals. These people will never accomplish anything in a military state with their approach, sadly. </p>
<p>Today, I also registered with the US embassy in Ankara. Somehow I expected something a little, well, nicer. I mean d’cor. Instead it was all ‘Fortress America’ and grim concrete walls, scuffed linoleum tiles all lighted by flickering fluorescent tubes hanging from the ceiling. Honestly, who wants to apply for a visa under those conditions? The people were quite helpful, if somewhat alarmed when I casually mentioned, ‘I’m thinking of going to Iraq, any law against that?’</p>
<p>Well! that sparked some interest in the bored Citizens Services drone behind his bulletproof glass. A Turk, he went and got a smooth talking American. Turns out it would be against the law, sort of, for me to go. But I’m an accredited journalist on assignment, so it’s cool. Well, ‘cool’ isn’t the word that Chris, the smooth talking American, would use but not illegal. (By the way, I would need a special passport from the State Dept. if I weren’t an accredited journalist.)</p>
<p>Anyway, all is well here, but complicated and trying. Sometimes I’m overwhelmed with a feeling that I really want to go home and forget all this adventuring business. Phones work weird, Turkish is very difficult and it’s hot. But people have been most friendly, pretty honest and Anatolia is a beautiful landscape, all rolling hills and maple trees. Oh, and the food is good.</p>
<p>So that’s it for now. Will try to write more as I can, but for now know that email might be more rare until I return from Iraq on July 21. Try not to worry. </p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/eastward-bound.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ecevit: Kurds dragging Turkey into war</title>
		<link>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/ecevit-kurds-dragging-turkey-into-war.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/ecevit-kurds-dragging-turkey-into-war.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2002 12:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Allbritton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecevit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PUK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://back-to-iraq.com/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I posted the constitutions last night along with my thoughts that the Kurds are asking for trouble, and wouldn't you know it? Today, the Guardian runs this. It's more of that growling that I mentioned in my previous post, but what's most alarming about this is Turkey's charges that the United States is directing the Kurds: "It is beyond encouragement, (Washington) is directing them," said Prime Minister Bulent Ecevit.
 <a href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/ecevit-kurds-dragging-turkey-into-war.php">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I posted the proposed Kurdish and Iraqi constitutions last nightand my thoughts that the Kurds are asking for troubleand wouldn’t you know it? Today, the <i>Guardian</i> runs <a title="Guardian Unlimited | World Latest | Kurds Said Dragging Turkey Into War" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-2086635,00.html">this</a>. It’s more of that growling that I mentioned in my previous post, but what’s most alarming about this is Turkey’s charges that the United States is directing the Kurds: “It is beyond encouragement, (Washington) is directing them,” Prime Minister Bulent Ecevit told the Turkish paper <i>Milliyet</i>. “We will talk to the United States.“<br />
If the United States <i>is</i> directing the PUK and the KDP, that would amount to a stunning reversal against Turkey, one of our most loyal allies in the region. I don’t think that we are, frankly, and these comments are likely playing to Ecevit’s nationalist base of support, which often views the U.S. with suspicion. (They still harbor resentments over Cyprus form 1964 and 1974.)<br />
The United States needs Turkey more than it needs the Kurds, sadly, as the Kurds have only about 80,000 lightly armed <i>peshmergas</i> while the Turks have tanks and F-16s (bought from the United States, of course.) They’re also a NATO ally and Incirlik is a necessary base for running sorties in the northern no-fly zone.<br />
But beyond that Turkey is valuable to the United States in that it provides a “good example” of democracy and Islam, serving as an effective ideological counterweight to Iran. It also has close ties to the Turkish-speaking peoples of central Asia and their energy reserves.<br />
This is why the United States has been such a <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/wire/World/ap20021009_1609.html">proponent</a> of Turkey’s ascension to the European Union. America’s support is a complex web of self-interest (keeping a strong, democratic Muslim nation tied to the West) and pay-back (see military alliance above.) It’s also why the Kurds of southeast Turkey both admire and resent the United States. They admire it for its stance on the Turkey-EU issue, and they see membership as the key to economic recovery in that depressed region. They resent America because it was <i>very</i> very supportive of Turkey’s war against the PKK’s terror campaign (which Turkey remembered when Sept. 11, 2001 happened.)<br />
So, again, I’m not sure what would happen if Iraq’s Kurds attain some form of independence. That would almost certainly drive the Turks to war in Iraqi Kurdistan, and what then would the Americans do? This may turn out to be a bigger question than who rules the day after Saddam…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/ecevit-kurds-dragging-turkey-into-war.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calif. congressman: “I don’t trust this president”</title>
		<link>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/calif-congressman-i-dont-trust-this-president.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/calif-congressman-i-dont-trust-this-president.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Allbritton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daschle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fremont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Stark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://back-to-iraq.com/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems the Democrats were outmaneuvered by Bush &#038; Co. yet again, just as Republicans were constantly outmaneuvered by President Clinton through most of the 1990s.
 <a href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/calif-congressman-i-dont-trust-this-president.php">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woah. <a title="Salon.com Politics | "The bottom line is I don't trust this president and his advisors"" href="http://www.salon.com/politics/feature/2002/10/10/stark/index.html">This</a> firery deunciation of Bush comes from Rep. Pete Stark, D-Calif. (He represents Fremont, home of the largest population of Afghanis in the United States, interestingly enough.) His statement is full of red meat for leftists, calling Bush a lightweight National Guardsman in the 1960s, and questioning his tough-guy cred by quoting columnist Molly Ivins: "For an upper-class white boy, Bush comes on way too hard. At a guess, to make up for being an upper-class white boy."<br />
I'm not one to take away from Mssr. Stark's statement. I agree with most of it, in that the people who will pick up the $200 billion (estimated) tab for Gulf War II: The Sequel will likely be people like my grandmother who depends on Medicare, but will see it cut to make way for Bush's tax cut and war costs. Others likely to pay include those who need unemployment insurance, students who don't get federal money to go to college and any number of natural Democratic constituencies.<br />
And now that the House and Seanate have passed their respective war resolutions, we have politicians like Sen. Tom Daschle, D-S.D., who say things like, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/12/opinion/12RICH.html">"The bottom line is . . . we want to move on."</a> The impression one gets is that Democrats want to move on to economic issues that play well a month from now, that might give them back the House and cement their hold on the Senate. Understandible, true, but at what cost?<br />
It seems the Democrats were outmaneuvered by Bush &#038; Co. yet again, just as Republicans were constantly outmaneuvered by President Clinton through most of the 1990s. Bush cranked up the war rhetoric from September on, to force an early vote, knowing the Democrats would be forced to either delay the vote, and open themselves up to charges of treason and/or wimpism (the Bush family's least favorite slur!) or rush the vote and give the president what he wanted in the first place. Of course, this week's quickie vote on war will come back to haunt the Democrats, when their liberal, anti-war supporters get wooed by the Green Party charging that Democrats and Republicans are but two sides of the same coin. (Nader's party is active in many close races, potentially threatening Democrats from the left.)<br />
So Mssr. Stark can afford to vote no and denounce Bush on the House floor. He’s  in a safe district. The question is, now that he’s got his war on, will Bush’s action leave anywhere safe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/calif-congressman-i-dont-trust-this-president.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update on House Vote</title>
		<link>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/update-on-house-vote.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/update-on-house-vote.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Allbritton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vietnam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://back-to-iraq.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hastert-Gephardt proposal (H.J.R 114) <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/10/international/10CND-IRAQ.html">passed</a> the House today on a 296-113 vote.
 <a href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/update-on-house-vote.php">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Hastert-Gephardt proposal (H.J.R 114) <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/10/international/10CND-IRAQ.html">passed</a> the House today on a 296–113 vote. The Senate also voted 75–25 to limit debate, meaning its vote on the war resolution could come as early as tomorrow. This is disappointing as the <a href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/archives/Files/SPRATT_044.PDF">Spratt amendment</a> was a common-sense approach to this whole killin’ Iraqis business. (For a glimpse of alternatives, <a href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/archives/Files/RL31596.pdf">Here’s</a> a PDF that compares the various House and Senate proposals.)<br />
All of this <i>may</i> be moot, however because sources on Capital Hill are saying that Bush doesn’t want war at all! That come Nov. 5, Bush will suddently start talking about how the <a href="http://www.un.org">United Nations</a> is a useful body after all, and that inspectors will be allowed to do their job. I’m told Bush doesn’t want to be looking at an occupied Iraq two years from now when we have guerilla fighting in Baghdad suburbs, a massive drain on the national economy and a stable oil supply only because United States occupation forces keep Kurds, Shi’ites and Sunni Arabs (not to mention Turkomen and Iranians) from each others’ throats. Add to that a daily trickle of body bags as one or two GIs die every couple of days. <i>That</i> wouldn’t be very fun to run on, would it? Especially since Bush avoided the horrors of a long, drawn out guerilla war once before!<br />
This would be a fascinating example of dog-wagging. At least President Clinton actually tossed some cruise missles around when he was accused of doing it to distract the nation from him “doing it.” In Bush’s case, however war with Iraq will have been talked up, the Middle East destabilized, the UN insulted and our reputation trashed with allies—all for short-term election gains. (Well, not <i>all</i> for short-term gains. No doubt there are plenty of true believers who think that Saddam should be blowed up real good, but trying to divine the influence of people like Karl Rove, Dick Cheney et al., is akin to Kremlinology.) A post-election change in rhetoric would prove the influence of “General Rove.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/update-on-house-vote.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

