<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Back to Iraq &#187; Turkey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/tag/turkey/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.back-to-iraq.com</link>
	<description>Back to Iraq &#124; Being a recounting of my journalistic ventures in Iraq</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:31:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>From AtatÃ¼rk to Allah?</title>
		<link>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/11/from-atata%c2%bcrk-to-allah.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/11/from-atata%c2%bcrk-to-allah.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2002 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Allbritton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islsmist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://back-to-iraq.com/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's election day in Turkey tomorrow and the big question is will the government turn from Atatï¿½rk to Allah?
 <a href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/11/from-atata%c2%bcrk-to-allah.php">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tomorrow is election day in Turkey and it’s coming down to the home stretch! The Justice and Development Party (AKP) is <a title="Party With Islamic Roots Likely to Win Turkish Vote" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/31/international/middleeast/31TURK.html?tntemail0">likely to win about 30 percent of the vote</a>, which would make them the senior partner in any coalition government, assuming they don’t win outright. The Republican People’s Party (CHP), founded by Turkey’s founder Mustafa Kemal AtatÃ¼rk, is polling at 15 to 20 percent. However, AtatÃ¼rk’s party is avowedly secular, so it’s unlikely the two would partner up.<br />
The situation is making the military and other secular Turks very, very nervous. In 1997, the AKP’s predecessor, the Welfare Party, was eased out by the military in what many have called a “soft coup.” But that option isn’t available now. With the European Union still dangling the carrot of membership, the Turkish military can’t risk stepping in and mucking about with elections and democracy. But the powers that be in Turkey also worry that a government headed by an Islamist party wouldn’t be attractive to Europe either, so Turkey is kind of caught in a bind.<br />
Further complicating the situation, <i>Milliyet</i> reported last week that Turkey’s top state prosecutor, Sabih Kanadoglu, has <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/europe/11/01/turkey.court/">filed for the closure of the AKP</a>, citing defiance by the party’s leader, former Istanbul mayor <a href="http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=225850&#038;contrassID=2&#038;subContrassID=5&#038;sbSubContrassID=0&#038;listSrc=Y" target="_blank">Recep Tayyip Erdogan</a>, to give up his party post. Erdogan was banned from participating in politics after he read a poem “inciting religious hatred” in a mosque in 1997 and served four months in jail. Though the case won’t be decided for months, if the party eventually is shut down its supporters would see their votes wasted. All this legal maneuvering has been an attempt by the military and secular leadership to depress the vote on AKP, and as I was told when I was in Ankara, “Turkey is the graveyard of political parties.“<br />
(For what it’s worth <i>Sabah</i> reported that U.S. State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said the United States is opposed to banning political parties. “The US supports democracy and broad political participation in Turkey and elsewhere,” he is quoted as saying. “We oppose the banning of political parties that are expressing their views in a peaceful and democratic manner.”)<br />
Though Erdogan is banned by law from serving in a governmental post — such as, oh, prime minister for example — the suspicion is that he will work behind the scenes running the country, probably through a weak prime minister. There is also concern that his commitment to moderation and democracy is only skin deep. He was elected mayor of Istanbul in 1994 and promptly banned alcohol in the city’s restaurants. He has close ties with former Welfare Party prime minister Erbakan, who dined with terrorists and talked of pulling out of NATO. Perhaps most ominously, “You cannot be secular and a Muslim at the same time,” Erdogan said in 1995.<br />
But he’s been crafty in how he has answered questions on how he would liberalize laws concerning the public expression of religion. For example, it is currently illegal for women to wear headscarves in universities, schools and government buildings or at government functions. This is a highly emotional issue in Turkey, with headscarves being a potent symbol of political Islam. Erdogan has been careful to not identify the AKP with this kind of controversy. Would his wife, an observant Muslim, wear a headscarf at government functions? “I wouldn’t bring her,” he has said, neatly not answering the question or assuaging Turkish women’s fears.<br />
So what are the scenarios? Near as I can tell, they are as follows:
<ul>
<li>The AKP wins decisively with enough seats in Parliament to form a government without resorting to a partner. The military might intervene or it might not. If it doesn’t, look for the AKP to be kept on a short leash.</li>
<li>The AKP wins a majority, but cannot form a government, in which case they will partner up with — possibly — <strike>Deniz Baykal’s</strike> Devlet Bahceli’s Nationalist Action Party (MHP). I think a coalition between the nationalists and Islamists could be one of the worst combinations. “The result will definitely be another coalition, an anomaly of very contradictory views,” said Prof. Deniz Ilgaz of Bogaziï¿½i University when I emailed her about all of this.</li>
<li>The myriad secular parties in Parliament band together in a broad-based coalition together to keep the AKP out of power. The resulting government would be weak and ineffectual, and would pretty much cement the status quo. None of the problems of Turkey would be addressed, and the military would remain the de facto ruler of the country.</li>
</ul>
<p>So what will happen and how might this affect the United States’ determination to open up some precision guided whoop-ass on Iraq, a fellow Muslim country and formerly a major trading partner to Turkey? We’ll have the outlines in a day. But one thing is certain is that the political landscape is about to change in unpredictable ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/11/from-atata%c2%bcrk-to-allah.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy birthday, Turkey</title>
		<link>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/happy-birthday-turkey.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/happy-birthday-turkey.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Allbritton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://back-to-iraq.com/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Happy 79th Birthday, Turkey!
 <a href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/happy-birthday-turkey.php">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy 79th birthday, Turkey! You look weeks younger!<br />
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk founded by the modern Turkish state Oct. 29, 79 years ago. For all of Turkey’s problems today, no one should underestimate the determination and accomplishment of Atatürk. In the face of hostile enemies, a skeptical world and a collection of peoples with no reason to band together, he forged a modern and Western-facing nation out of the ashes of the Ottoman Empire. Regardless of how people view the modern Turkey, it’s a damn sight better than what might have been had he failed. And for that I tip my hat to Father Turk.<br />
I also think that were he alive today, he would have brought the same energy, determination (and, frankly, authoritarianism) to the problems of the Republic. But he’s not, and Turkey needs to step out of the great man’s shadow and move on. Atatürk was able to accomplish what he did because he didn’t worry about the democratic process. And his approach was exactly right for what was needed at the time. But today, Turkey must embrace a full democracy and remove the military from the decision making process. The slogan that adorns the steps leading up to Atatürk’s mausoleum in Ankara should be amended. Instead of “Sovereignty rests with the Nation,” it should instead derive from the people — all of them, Turks and Kurds alike. His admonition to the army to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic should come with the appendix the people are not the enemy; they are citizens.<br />
I’d like to think that Atatürk would recognize this. Turkey no longer needs a Great Man. It needs a great people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/happy-birthday-turkey.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Turkey preparing to invade Kurdistan?</title>
		<link>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/turkey-preparing-to-invade-kurdistan.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/turkey-preparing-to-invade-kurdistan.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Allbritton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barzani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nationalist Movement Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talabani]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://back-to-iraq.com/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Turkey has been making noises that the Iraqi Kurds should not get too hopeful about establishing a quasi-independent entity in the three governates they control in northern Iraq. Now, it looks like Turkey is ready to back up their words with force. However, there is an election coming up in Turkey, so the possibility that this is all fodder for domestic constituencies cannot be ruled out.
 <a href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/turkey-preparing-to-invade-kurdistan.php">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turkey has been making noises that the Iraqi Kurds should not get too hopeful about establishing a quasi-independent entity in the three governates they control in northern Iraq. Now, it looks like Turkey is ready to back up their words with force. (At least they’re consistent.) However, there is an election coming up in Turkey, so the possibility that this is all fodder for domestic constituencies cannot be ruled out.<br />
On the they-really-mean-it side of the equation, ArabicNews.com is reporting that Turkish deputy prime minister Doulat Bahjali said that his country <a title="Turkey's concern about north Iraq" href="http://arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Day/021022/2002102212.html">must reconsider its stance</a> regarding northern Iraq. Since 1991 when it got dragged into Operation Provide Comfort (the allied establishment of the northern no-fly zone to protect Kurdish refugees from the 1990–91 Gulf War,) Turky has gone back and forth in its relations with the PUK and KDP. At times the relationship was warm enough that Barzani and Talabani, the leaders of the respective parties, traveled under Turkish diplomatic passports.<br />
That has apparently ended with finality after the  Kurdistan Regional Government convened its parliament in October and introduced a proposal for a federal republic of Iraq with a Kurdish entity in the north and with Kirkuk as its capital. Kirkuk, rich in oil and history is home to Kurds, Arabs, Assyrians and Turkomen, to whose defense Bahjali is leaping.<br />
“The pressures which are imposed on the Turkomen under Saddam Hussein were great and that they are at the meantime exposed to a new threat by the two Kurdish leaders Masoud al-Barazani and Jalal al-Talabani targeting their cities of Mosul, Kirkuk and Arbil,” ArabicNews.com says. <i>(Ed. I changed some spellings of towns in this quote.)</i><br />
This backs up the it’s-all-politics argument, since the Turkomen are a natural ally of Bahjali’s National Movement Party, and bashing the Kurds is always a surefire way to rally the nationalist faithful. <i>However</i>, Turkish defense minister Sbah Eddin Oglo said Oct. 14 that Turkey intends to <a href="http://www.arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Day/021015/2002101518.html">establish ‘a security belt’</a> in northern Iraq and that intelligence agencies have reported that Turkey has increased its troop strength in Iraqi Kurdistan from 4,000 to 10,000 troops.<br />
All of this must be driving the United States crazy. The last thing it needs is a Kurdish-Turkish dispute in northern Iraq just when it’s trying to get its ducks in a row should shooting start. And this is exactly the kind of chaos various pundits have predicted would happen if Saddam is removed and regional rivalries are allowed to flare. But wasn’t that supposed to happen <i>after</i> a war?<br />
Keep watching the Turks. They hold the key to all of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/turkey-preparing-to-invade-kurdistan.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HADEP Deputy Chairman: “This is democracy in Turkey”</title>
		<link>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/hadep-deputy-chairman-this-is-democracy-in-turkey.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/hadep-deputy-chairman-this-is-democracy-in-turkey.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2002 14:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Allbritton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HADEP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://back-to-iraq.com/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In which the Deputy Chairman of HADEP, the Kurdish party in Turkey, talks about the state of affairs in the southeast part of the country.
 <a href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/hadep-deputy-chairman-this-is-democracy-in-turkey.php">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">While in Ankara, Aykut and I spent a day trying to find the local offices of various Iraqi and Kurdish opposition groups including the KDP and PUK. We were looking for various officials who might be able to help me when I went to Diyarbakir in the southeast and on to Iraq, but we weren’t having much luck, and kept driving through twisty neighborhoods hoping the cops weren’t following us.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">At one point, the comedy descended into farce, as we drove into a military residence area looking for the embassies. We found the embassies, but the PUK still eluded us. We drove past the Jordanian, Syrian and Saudi Embassies, but finally stopped outside the the United Arab Emirates while Aykut jumped out of the car and asked a bored-looking security guard for directions. </p>
<p style="text-align: left;">“Excuse me, where are the offices for the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan?” Akyut asked while I shrunk into my seat and tried to look invisible.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The guard, a Turk and apparently no friend of Iraqi Kurds, looked him up and down, looked me up and down, and then motioned off down the road. </p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Aykut dropped his bulk into the drivers’ seat and smiled at me. </p>
<p style="text-align: left;">“Don’t do that again,” I said.</p>
</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">He apologized, but at least the guard’s directions were good. We finally found the rather sad looking house that was the office for the PUK. No one was around except for a plainclothes guy who watched us closely and smoked a cigarette like a fugitive. He made me nervous, so we left to go meet A. Turan Demir, the deputy chairman of <a href="http://www.hadep.org.tr/" target="_blank">HADEP</a>, the Kurdish party in Turkey. The transcript — from Aykut’s translation — follows:</p>
</p>
<p><span id="more-28"></span></p>
<blockquote><p><b>We’re heading to Diyarbakir on Tuesday, and we’re hoping to find out what’s been happening there since 1998, how things have changed, how people are coping with the depressed economy. Are people getting better or staying the same?<br /></b>The interior fighting has been stopped in Turkey, and we’ve observed people have partially been getting better, all around Turkey but especially in southeast turkey. Because the people in the region have suffered a lot from the fighting going on in that area. When the fighting was going on for many years, there was martial law and emergency rule going on in the area, for 20–25 years, either martial law or emergency law in the area starting from 1980. But the martial law was established in 1978 even before the military takeover.</p>
</p>
<p><b>Why was it established in 1978?</b><br />Because in 1978, there was fighting going on all around Turkey, that was the reason why the military takeover happened. The fighting all around Turkey at this time was between the left groups and the rightists. But of course the one which we witnessed in the last couple of years was much worse, in the southeast this time. But those days, all Turkey was in fighting. That was the reason for the military takeover in 1980.</p>
</p>
<p>We are optimists that the Emergency Rule will be finished in two cities and will be finished two months later in the other two cities <i>[Ed. Since this interview, emergency rule has been lifted in much of southeast Turkey.]</i> We are optimists about this. But you see, the habits that have been established in the area by the local authorities cannot be changed very quickly. They may change the Emergency Rule, but practically, we’ll see…</p>
<p><b>Who are those local administrators?</b><br />They are administrators and military/police power of the area that are appointed by Ankara. Of course, not [HADEP] mayors (He laughs). For example, the governor did not even accept the mayors. There are many examples like this in the southeast. You’ll see it in Diyarbakir. While the local administrators who wanted to attend the local ceremonies on the national days were rejected by the governor or the military powers of the area.</p>
<p><b>So how are the mayors doing their job?</b><br />In difficult conditions! But to come back to your question, when you compare it with the old days, there is some optimism. It is hard to say that there is a positive effect on the economic and social life of the people in the area. For example, in the days when the people had to live their villages, four million people had to leave 3,000 villages. They still can not go back.</p>
<p><b>Is that because the Army won’t let them?</b><br />Yes. The army doesn’t let them. They are accumulated in the cities in the area, some of them have moved to the cities of the west, Istanbul, Izmir, Mersin, like those cities.</p>
<p><b>If the war’s over, why aren’t they being allowed to go back to their villages?</b><br />This is the negative aspect of the government. We do not understand the reasons why the government doesn’t let the people back.</p>
<p><b>What reasons have been given?</b><br />They don’t give any reasons! But sometimes, not officially but personally, when we talk to the local officials, sometimes they say we can go back. But they won’t take the first step. In three or five villages, just for propaganda, they let people go back to their villages. Individually, when the people attempt to go back to their villages, they are not let back in, they are pushed back.</p>
<p><b>Are these villages now abandoned?</b><br />Abandoned, yes, abandoned. </p>
<p><b>How many of these villages are there?</b><br />Close to 3,000.</p>
<p><b>Can you show me on the map?</b><br /><i>(He points to the eastern and southeast parts of Anatolia and in around Lake Van, encompassing vast swaths.)</i> There are many villages like this, we’re talking about all eastern and middle eastern parts of the country.</p>
<p><b>Is that one of the main goals of HADEP, to enable people to come back to their villages?</b><br />Of course. We have been trying really hard. We didn’t know how many villages were empty, how many people left from those places, where did they go, in which conditions they are living now—</p>
<p><b>HADEP didn’t know any of this.</b><br />We knew it, but we wanted to have it documented. There is also an association known as GÃ–Ã‡-DER [an internal refugee association in Istanbul], that has been established to help these people go back to their villages. This is the solidarity association for those who have been displaced.</p>
<p>There are 50,000 family applications to HADEP. And also 17,000 families applied to GÃ–Ã‡-DER. They said, please give our petitions to the central government in Ankara, please let us go back to our villages.</p>
<p><b>What’s the time frame on these petitions?</b><br />They started a year ago, and it lasted about 5–6 months, but HADEP has a lot of things to do and couldn’t get too deeply involved. As a result, all of these people — even though there is no reason that all these villages are empty and the fighting is finished and the organization known as the <a href="http://terrorismanswers.com/groups/kurdistan.html">PKK [Kurdistan Workers’ Party]</a> took all their armed forces away from the borders — the reason these villages were empty is that these people were accused of helping the PKK. But now there’s no reason, since there’s no PKK. At least there’s no armed forces guerilla group. </p>
<p>Turkey is now going through a very big economic crisis, and the reason Turkey is going through this crisis is this, I think. When the war ended, there was a refugee problem. Of course, the bill of the war is really big. Official estimates are that it’s about $100 billion dollars. But you see, all in these areas, the people who were displaced can’t do agriculture. They are not producing anything and they can not do anything economically. They can’t put anything into the economy of the Turkey. Cities are accepting these people and these people are now living in the squatters’ sections. And they problems of these cities are also growing very fast. Cities like Diyarbakir, Izmir, Istanbul, Marsin…</p>
<p><b>What was HADEP’s official position regarding the PKK?</b><br />PKK is out of our organization. It’s an illegal organization, was an illegal organization. That’s important. Because there is no PKK existing anymore. They disbanded. We do not have any organic relation with the PKK. But there is a reality and we always say this very clearly, the Kurds who are living in the east and southeast parts of Turkey, most of them feel close themselves to the PKK. For example, more or less, one in three families gave their children to the guerilla group PKK. And generally, they (Kurds) say that since we are sensitive to the democratic problems of Turkey and especially in the southeast and east, of course they have sympathy to HADEP as well. This is because all of these organizations they have a common group of people and interests. This is the relation. Otherwise, we do not have any organic relation. </p>
<p><i>[Ed. The term “organic relation” comes up a lot in conversations, and it’s a result of Aykut’s translating. It’s best thought of as a natural alliance, such as one that might occur between the Green Party and the Sierra Club in America.]</i></p>
<p>But from the beginning of HADEP, we all wanted to stop this fighting. And we all spent a lot of effort for that. Even now still we support this idea. From now on Turkey has to finish this fighting. There has to be established constant interior peace in Turkey in order to establish this, there has to be a democratic situation as well. That’s to say, concretely, the government has to declare an amnesty and PKK has to disband all its armed forces that are still kept beyond the borders of Turkey and struggle in the legal way. </p>
<p>There are some urgent measures to be taken for the Kurdish problem in Turkey. Generally, all the people have to expend effort to the solution of the problem. The <a href="http://www.mfa.gov.tr/grupa/ad/adab/copenhagen.htm">Copenhagen Criteria</a> have to be established in Turkey.</p>
<p><b>What is the list of priorities of HADEP?</b><br />We want to see a civic life established under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This democratic status that exists in Europe has to be established in Turkey. The constitution is a military takeover constitution and we still use it. This [1980] constitution has to be demolished and written again. Mostly the NGOs have to give advice for the reconstruction of the constitution. The constitution has to be up for debate among all the institutions of Turkey. </p>
<p><b>So you don’t think the recent amendments go far enough.</b><br />No. <i>[Ed. Turkey recently passed 14 amendments that would bring Turkish law in line with EU standards, but they fall far short of what Demir is asking for.]</i></p>
<p>The Kurds make up 20 million people in Turkey. This is an ethnic group with its own history, its own language. So first of all, they (Turkey) first have to accept the existence of this ethnicity. And as being another ethnic group, they have to have some basic rights. They must be able to express their identities freely so they can express their feelings with their mother tongue in their social life. They must be able to practice their culture freely without interruption. <i>[Ed. The 1924 Treaty of Lausanne, which established modern Turkey, laid out the rights of ethnic minorities in the new state. Kurds are not listed among them.]</i></p>
<p>Last year, university students applied to their faculties to have the right to have education in their mother tongue. But as a result of this, they were expelled and some of them arrested. </p>
<p><b>Which schools?</b><br />Nearly all universities. Every university! In some universities 15, in some universities 500 students were expelled. In their petitions, which is their natural right, they didn’t write down that education has to be done in Kurdish. They wanted Kurdish taught as a language. They didn’t want all education in Kurdish. They wanted it as as English and French are taught in the high schools as second languages, they wanted Kurdish to be taught like this as well.</p>
<p>The other problem here, it is also written in the constitution that everyone can give a petition to the government. If it doesn’t accept the petition, that’s OK. But why are they [the students] sentenced? This shows the quality of this political regime.</p>
<p>The Kurdish problem can be solved only by giving cultural rights to the Kurds but not by splitting the country.</p>
<p><b>This kind of intense desire to express your culture, it’s hard to understand for Americans. Most Americans would say why don’t they just blend in, why don’t they just go with the flow? So maybe you can explain and help me understand why the intense feelings?</b><br />The question is, to the people of America, if somebody forbids them speaking their own language, taking from them the rights of education, what would be the response? These are the basic human rights, the values of today’s world. People are now talking about Third generation rights. This is so bad to us, that we have to reject our own identity of a people. This is the worst thing to us, to reject this identity. </p>
<p><b>Would HADEP consider working with KADEK in a democratic context?</b><br />No. This is important. It seems the PKK has disbanded itself and it seems <a href="http://www.cdi.org/terrorism/pkk-pr.cfm">KADEK</a> has emerged from the PKK. As far as we know, as a style of organization and also the political perspective, it seems that it’s partially different than the PKK. And as we know, they are not only interested in the Kurds in Turkey, but in Iraq, Iran, Syria, anywhere Kurds are living. This is a different, new organization, but it’s an illegal organization in Turkey. </p>
<p>Of course, there is no relation established with these people.</p>
<p><b>Do you trust them?</b><br />It’s quite difficult to say anything now, as I told you. Our priority is that Turkey has to apply democratic rules and we’re trying to establish there are no illegal organizations in Turkey. So we want that everyone has to express themselves legally in a democratic situation. This is our priority. This is the solution. Otherwise, these [PKK and KADEK] are very popular organizations. But there are many, many others minor organizations. These are not the only ones. Turkey is the graveyard of political parties. In the last 40 years, 40–50 political parties have been shut down by the Constitutional Court, like HEP, OZDEP and DEP.</p>
<p>HADEP is currently on trial in the Constitutional Court. Very soon, they’re going to make a decision for HADEP, since they opened a case in 1998. We don’t know but it seems all the justice process has been finished and this is the last process now. In our last defense, we demanded the case be dismissed because the government had recently changed the law regarding political parties in Turkey. This last change destroys the reason for our party to be closed.</p>
<p>But on July 9, they’re going to debate this demand (for dismissal.) After they took this demand, it could be a week or 10 days or a month. They don’t have to give a time frame. So this is related to the powers that control politics in Turkey. </p>
<p><b>Does HADEP have a position on Abdullah Ocalan, the head of the PKK who was captured in 1998?</b><br />Recently we declared our perspective, as a party that is pro-democracy. Even though it is applied in your country, we definitely reject his execution under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In 1994, when we formed this party, we rejected execution. So how can we say this should be applied to Ocalan? This was also declared by the government before. If Ocalan’s execution is passed by parliament, it would lead Turkey to chaos. Unofficially, people from the government say this will lead Turkey into war again. When you consider the positions of the Kurds, you can imagine what would happen in the southeast.</p>
<p><b>How did you get involved in politics? What’s your background?</b><br />I was a leftist (Socialist) when I was a student at Izmir University studying history. I was a teacher afterwards. After that, I worked for leftist organizations such as the workers unions as a specialist and an administrator. And afterwards, I took part in a political party that was formed in the 1970s, the Turkish Socialist Workers’ Party (TSIP.) I worked for the Human Rights Association in Izmir starting in 1989 and I was the chairman of the Izmir branch and also in the administration of the whole organization in Ankara. So starting in the beginning, I was in HADEP. I was the local director in Izmir. In 1998, I was chosen as the general secretary and I was arrested that year and spent a year in jail. </p>
<p><b>Why were you arrested?</b><br />In 1998, when Ocalan was loose, local chapters of HADEP allowed individual Kurds to stage hunger strikes in their offices in cities around Turkey in support of Ocalan. Police came to the headquarters in Ankara and arrested several people, including myself. After four days in custody, I were taken to court and charged with aiding the PKK under section 169 of Turkish law [which deals with aiding illegal organizations.]</p>
<p>I was in prison for eight months while on trial. It was then that parliament passed a law that allowed for the conditional release of certain prisoners and I was one of them. The trial was never finished.</p>
<p>I continued my political activities however, and was jailed again for 10 months, being released in Sept. 2001. Today, I face still more charges, but I don’t know how many. </p>
<p><i>(He rummages in his desk and finally slaps down a 2-inch thick stack of indictments against him.)</i></p>
<p>This is democracy in Turkey.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/hadep-deputy-chairman-this-is-democracy-in-turkey.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ecevit: Kurds dragging Turkey into war</title>
		<link>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/ecevit-kurds-dragging-turkey-into-war.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/ecevit-kurds-dragging-turkey-into-war.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2002 12:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Allbritton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecevit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PUK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://back-to-iraq.com/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I posted the constitutions last night along with my thoughts that the Kurds are asking for trouble, and wouldn't you know it? Today, the Guardian runs this. It's more of that growling that I mentioned in my previous post, but what's most alarming about this is Turkey's charges that the United States is directing the Kurds: "It is beyond encouragement, (Washington) is directing them," said Prime Minister Bulent Ecevit.
 <a href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/ecevit-kurds-dragging-turkey-into-war.php">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I posted the proposed Kurdish and Iraqi constitutions last nightand my thoughts that the Kurds are asking for troubleand wouldn’t you know it? Today, the <i>Guardian</i> runs <a title="Guardian Unlimited | World Latest | Kurds Said Dragging Turkey Into War" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-2086635,00.html">this</a>. It’s more of that growling that I mentioned in my previous post, but what’s most alarming about this is Turkey’s charges that the United States is directing the Kurds: “It is beyond encouragement, (Washington) is directing them,” Prime Minister Bulent Ecevit told the Turkish paper <i>Milliyet</i>. “We will talk to the United States.“<br />
If the United States <i>is</i> directing the PUK and the KDP, that would amount to a stunning reversal against Turkey, one of our most loyal allies in the region. I don’t think that we are, frankly, and these comments are likely playing to Ecevit’s nationalist base of support, which often views the U.S. with suspicion. (They still harbor resentments over Cyprus form 1964 and 1974.)<br />
The United States needs Turkey more than it needs the Kurds, sadly, as the Kurds have only about 80,000 lightly armed <i>peshmergas</i> while the Turks have tanks and F-16s (bought from the United States, of course.) They’re also a NATO ally and Incirlik is a necessary base for running sorties in the northern no-fly zone.<br />
But beyond that Turkey is valuable to the United States in that it provides a “good example” of democracy and Islam, serving as an effective ideological counterweight to Iran. It also has close ties to the Turkish-speaking peoples of central Asia and their energy reserves.<br />
This is why the United States has been such a <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/wire/World/ap20021009_1609.html">proponent</a> of Turkey’s ascension to the European Union. America’s support is a complex web of self-interest (keeping a strong, democratic Muslim nation tied to the West) and pay-back (see military alliance above.) It’s also why the Kurds of southeast Turkey both admire and resent the United States. They admire it for its stance on the Turkey-EU issue, and they see membership as the key to economic recovery in that depressed region. They resent America because it was <i>very</i> very supportive of Turkey’s war against the PKK’s terror campaign (which Turkey remembered when Sept. 11, 2001 happened.)<br />
So, again, I’m not sure what would happen if Iraq’s Kurds attain some form of independence. That would almost certainly drive the Turks to war in Iraqi Kurdistan, and what then would the Americans do? This may turn out to be a bigger question than who rules the day after Saddam…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/ecevit-kurds-dragging-turkey-into-war.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposed Iraqi constitution(s) asking for trouble</title>
		<link>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/proposed-iraqi-constitutions-asking-for-trouble.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/proposed-iraqi-constitutions-asking-for-trouble.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2002 19:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Allbritton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal republic of iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://back-to-iraq.com/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's something you won't find anywhere else. (I googled.) These are the scanned copies of the proposed constitutions for Iraq, post-Saddam. Sami Abdul Rahman, the deputy prime minister (KDP) of the Kurdistan Regional Government, gave them to me after I interviewed him in his offices in the Parliament building in Arbil. He wrote them, and the KDP and PUK, in a rare show of public unity, have signed on. Even State, back in July, said the ideas were "interesting."
 <a href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/proposed-iraqi-constitutions-asking-for-trouble.php">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s something you won’t find anywhere else. (I googled.) These are the scanned copies of the proposed constitutions for Iraq, post-Saddam. Sami Abdul Rahman, the deputy prime minister (<a href="http://www.kdp.pp.se/">KDP</a>) of the <a href="http://www.krg.org">Kurdistan Regional Government</a>, gave them to me after I interviewed him in his offices in the Parliament building in Arbil. He wrote them, and the KDP and PUK, in a rare show of public unity, have signed on. Even State, back in July, said the ideas were “interesting.“<br />
There are two files, the proposed <a href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/archives/Files/FRICon.pdf">constitution for a Federal Republic of Iraq (3.0MB)</a>, heavily modeled on the United States Constitution, and the constitution for the <a href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/archives/Files/KurdCon.pdf">Kurdish region (5.6MB)</a>. Sorry for the size of the files. I tried to make them as small as I could.<br />
The first one maps out a plan that would divide the <a href="http://www.krg.org/reference/images/IKR07.jpg">country</a> into two regions: The Arabs would get the middle and southern regions along with the province of Nineveh (excepting regions that have Kurdish majorities) and the Kurds would get the provinces of Kirkuk, Suleimaniya, Arbil and Duhok, the districts of Aqra, Sheihkan and Sinjar and  the sub-districts of Zimar (in Nineveh), Khaniqin and Mandali (Diyala) and Badra (in the province of Al-Wasit.) Unlike the U.S. Constitution, however, there is a state religion — Islam — and official languages (Kurdish in the Kurdish regions and Arabic in the other.)<br />
There is a liberal collection of rights granted, but a worrisome dependence on “the law,” as in, “No one can be captured, detained, jailed, or searched except in circumstances defined in law.” This loophole is scattered throughout the document, subordinating the constitutions to whatever the regional or national legislatures want to write into the lawbooks. Instead of being the supreme law of the land, as in the United States, the constitutions instead provide justification for, say, the harsh rule of <i>shar’ia</i>, should Islamists gain control over the National Assembly.<br />
And while “power is inherent in the people as they are the source of its legitmacy,” I worry that this draft is too weak to protect the people of Iraq (and particularly the Kurds) from democracy gone bad. Jeffersonian these documents ain’t.<br />
There’s also a lot that will piss off the Turks, making the adoption of this charter less than likely. The Kurds blame much of Iraq’s (and by extension their own) misfortunes on the centralization of power in Iraq. This is <i>exactly</i> the problem in Turkey and while a few Turkish intellectuals have floated the idea of a federal structure in Turkey, that idea has about as much of a chance as Saddam does of winning another war and occupying Washington.<br />
As the preamble says:</p>
<blockquote><p>Centralization in government has lost its appeal even within simple and homogenous communities. It has especially lost its rationale for being resorted to in communities that are of a pluralist nature made up of various nationalities, religious groups and languages, such as the Iraqi <i>[Ed: And Turkish]</i> community. The high degree of centralization and the indifference of decision makers to the presence of the special characteristics of the Kurdish people are among the basic reasons for the Kurds being deprived of their legitimate rights under successive Iraqi governments, which came to power under both the monarchy and the republic. This style of restricting authority in t he centre and the unwillingness to share it with the Kurds on a practical basis, even after the March 11, 1970 autonomy agreement has been the hallmark of the role of the Iraqi state.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, yeah, and Saddam murdering innocent women and children with chemical weapons has also been a “hallmark of the role of the Iraqi state.” Harping on the evils centralization and the failure to recognize the special nature of Kurds — which is <i>exactly</i> what has been happening in Turkey since 1921 — is asking for trouble, if you ask me. Every criticism mentioned in the preamble against Iraq could equally be leveled at Turkey. (Except the Turks haven’t bombed villages with aflatoxin or other weapons of mass destruction.) And Turkey has been growling that any deal that leaves the Kurds with independence, either <i>de facto</i> or <i>de jure</i>, will be met with guns and tanks. And I have no idea what the United States, as the new regional powerbroker, would do if a NATO ally began operations in the area America claims as conquered territory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/proposed-iraqi-constitutions-asking-for-trouble.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Holy crap, I’m in Istanbul (redux)</title>
		<link>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/holy-crap-im-in-istanbul-redux.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/holy-crap-im-in-istanbul-redux.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Allbritton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constantinople]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instanbul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://back-to-iraq.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First in a series detailing my travels in the ancient lands of Mesopotamia. In this episode, I land in Istanbul and get my bearings.
 <a href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/holy-crap-im-in-istanbul-redux.php">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>This was my email to a list of friends and family that I sent out after I landed in Istanbul and started my trip. Except for some minor editing (typos, spelling errors, continuity and some grammar clean-up) this is what went out, more or less (except for really stupid, personal stuff.) This entry was emailed <b>July 2, 2002</b> while I was overlooking the Bosporus, the narrow strait that divides the city and the two continents of Europe and Asia.<br />
This is the first entry of a continuing series of my emails and journal entries of my trip over there. It’s designed to whet your appetite so you will send me back. (Hint: Donate button is over to the right.)</i><br />
<code>From: Christopher Allbritton<br />
Date: Tue Jul 2, 2002 3:20:59 AM US/Pacific </code><br />
<blockquote><a href="http://www.turktravel.net/istanbul/index.asp" onclick="OpenWindow(this.href); return false">Istanbul!</a><br />
I landed at Atatürk International yesterday at 3 p.m. or so after a couple of hours cooling my heels in Budapest. Took a bus to Taksim, the central plaza in the “modern” part of the city, and from there, I took a taxi up to Boğazi’i University, where I’m staying thanks to the hospitality of Prof. Deniz Ilgaz.<br />
Damn, this is a confusing place. The street energy is like New York at a rave but without the feelgood vibe. The taxi drivers are homicidal (and suicidal) and the cars bear the scars of numerous encounters with bumpers and doors and hapless pedestrians. The city passes by in a blur, but ancient structures exist among modern skyscrapers and western fastfood chains. It’s all a bit overwhelming.<br />
And Turkish is just impossible. But first, some basic geography: Istanbul is divided in half by the Bosporus, duh, into European and Asian (Anatolian) sides. The European side is further divided into North and South parts by the Golden Horn, a great natural harbor. South is the old, Ottoman city with all the tourist stuff (<a href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/archives/Files/Hagia Sofia.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.back-to-iraq.com/archives/Files/Hagia Sofia.html', 'popup', 'width=640,height=437,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false">Aya Sofia</a>, the Blue Mosque, yadda yadda yadda.) In the 19th century this part of the city, called Eminönü, was left to the Sultans as an Ottoman playground with harems, palaces, hookahs, and the whole Disneyland on opium thing. The northern part, (Beyoğlu) where I’m staying, was modernized, with streetcars, telephones, plumbing, etc. So I have to go into Eminönü to get my press creds. The office is housed in one of innumerable palaces on the Bosporus. And there are a lot of them.<br />
<i>[Editor’s note: Here lie three paragraphs that detail the dynamics of a particularly bad liaison I had while in Germany. It really doesn’t do anyone any good to rehash this stuff, so I cut them.]</i><br />
Back to Turkey. I took out 200,000,000 Turkish Lira from my account at the airport yesterday. I’ve never withdrawn 200 million of <i>anything</i> before, so I felt like a real rich guy. (It’s about $125 or so.) I still have, after paying for a couple of meals, a taxi ride and a bus ride, … Uh, shit. A whole lot of zeros. Actually, I still have 178 million TL, or about $111.25… Jesus, all of that cost just under $15? I could live like a king in Istanbul if I had dollars coming in.<br />
I’m staying in an antique Ottoman house near the Bosporus ( Boğazi’i in Turkish, don’t ask me how to pronounce it.) From my window, I can see the old fortress <a href="http://www.business-with-turkey.com/tourist-guide/rumeli_hisar_fortress.htm" onclick="OpenWindow(this.href); return false">Hisar</a>, the fort built by Sultan Fatih to conquer Constantinople in 1453. There’s an even older fort on the opposite side, the Asian side, built by the Byzantines, and I don’t mean the Eastern Roman Empire. I mean the people who built the city of Byzantium that predates even Emperor Constantine, who founded Constantinople in AD 338, if I recall the date correctly.<br />
At any rate, it’s really, really old.<br />
And why did they change the name from Constantinople? That’s nobody’s business but the Turks. (Actually, it’s a corruption of a Greek term that means “in the city.”)<br />
Today, at 2:30, I meet with Kemal Kiriş’i, a Boğazi’i University professor who wrote a book on the Kurds and now deals with EU-Turkey issues. I think he will be very informative. After that, I have to go in to the <i>old</i> city, across the Golden Horn, and pick up my press credentials. That should take the better part of the rest of the day. Then I’m meeting some people I’ve been emailing for dinner and that’s that. Whew!<br />
On Thursday, in celebration of July 4, I will get on a bus to Ankara, where I will meet my fixer. We’ll work on some logistics and plan for a few days and then head out to Diyarbakir and the rest of the country. It’s a shame I won’t have more time in Istanbul, as it’s a fascinating city. Bigger than NYC, too. Nine million people (although that’s only about 5.625 people thanks to the exchange rate.)<br />
So that’s it. All is well, and I have my own Internet access. Life is good.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.back-to-iraq.com/2002/10/holy-crap-im-in-istanbul-redux.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

