The latest silly article on Iran…

Aside

Pos­si­bly one of the most ridicu­lous arti­cles I’ve read in a while: Why Iran’s Top Lead­ers Believe That The End Of Days Has Come | Fox News.

Yeah, I know. “Fox News”, right? But one of the rea­sons Iran is so mys­te­ri­ous is because US and other west­ern lead­ers don’t know what the régime’s lead­er­ship is think­ing, much less that they’re obsessed with the “end times.”

Eastward bound…

This is the sec­ond of my posts from Turkey, made after I arrived in Ankara. Prior to my arrival, I met with Turan Cey­lan, the man­ager of the Inter-​Continental Hotel in Istan­bul. He’s a Kur­dish suc­cess story, one of many in Istan­bul where many Kurds have set­tled after the PKK trou­bles in the south­east dur­ing the 1980s and 1990s. I didn’t get much to get out of the inter­view, except that he is pro-​EU (he’s a busi­ness­man) and he believes that dis­crim­i­na­tion against Kurds is blown way out of pro­por­tion by West­ern press (which is easy for him to say; he comes from a rich fam­ily that runs one of the largest con­struc­tion firms in Turkey.)

This was an atti­tude I dis­cov­ered among many middle-​class Istan­bul res­i­dents. Aydin Kudu, my orig­i­nal fixer before he suf­fered a hip injury, had me over for din­ner and dur­ing the post-​prandial tea, he and Raia, his girl­friend and some­times partner-​guide, said the same thing: There is no dis­crim­i­na­tion in Turkey; Kurds can do what­ever they like, as long as they don’t break any laws.

On one level, they have a point. At least one pres­i­dent of Turkey, Turgut Ozal, has claimed Kur­dish ances­try and Istan­bul has seen a num­ber of Kurds other than Cey­lan rise to suc­cess in the busi­ness­world. But there is a great deal of unknown truth in the state­ment that “Kurds can do what­ever they like, as long as they don’t break any laws.” But until recently, it was ille­gal to be Kur­dish. It was ille­gal to teach or sing in Kur­dish. Yes, Kurds could suc­ceed in Turkey, but only if they assim­i­lated and acted Turk­ish. And even then, if someone’s ID card listed them as hail­ing from the south­east, they would often be greeted with sus­pi­cion and had a harder time find­ing jobs in the more cos­mopoli­tan west­ern part of the country.

At any rate, this gave me much to think about. So after a cou­ple of days, I took a bus from Tak­sim in Istan­bul where Aykut Uzun, my fixer, met me. After five hours on the road in Turkey, I was glad to see him.

Con­tinue read­ing

Update on House Vote

The Hastert-​Gephardt pro­posal (H.J.R 114) passed the House today on a 296113 vote. The Sen­ate also voted 7525 to limit debate, mean­ing its vote on the war res­o­lu­tion could come as early as tomor­row. This is dis­ap­point­ing as the Spratt amend­ment was a common-​sense approach to this whole killin’ Iraqis busi­ness. (For a glimpse of alter­na­tives, Here’s a PDF that com­pares the var­i­ous House and Sen­ate pro­pos­als.)
All of this may be moot, how­ever because sources on Cap­i­tal Hill are say­ing that Bush doesn’t want war at all! That come Nov. 5, Bush will sud­dently start talk­ing about how the United Nations is a use­ful body after all, and that inspec­tors will be allowed to do their job. I’m told Bush doesn’t want to be look­ing at an occu­pied Iraq two years from now when we have guerilla fight­ing in Bagh­dad sub­urbs, a mas­sive drain on the national econ­omy and a sta­ble oil sup­ply only because United States occu­pa­tion forces keep Kurds, Shi’ites and Sunni Arabs (not to men­tion Turkomen and Ira­ni­ans) from each oth­ers’ throats. Add to that a daily trickle of body bags as one or two GIs die every cou­ple of days. That wouldn’t be very fun to run on, would it? Espe­cially since Bush avoided the hor­rors of a long, drawn out guerilla war once before!
This would be a fas­ci­nat­ing exam­ple of dog-​wagging. At least Pres­i­dent Clin­ton actu­ally tossed some cruise missles around when he was accused of doing it to dis­tract the nation from him “doing it.” In Bush’s case, how­ever war with Iraq will have been talked up, the Mid­dle East desta­bi­lized, the UN insulted and our rep­u­ta­tion trashed with allies — all for short-​term elec­tion gains. (Well, not all for short-​term gains. No doubt there are plenty of true believ­ers who think that Sad­dam should be blowed up real good, but try­ing to divine the influ­ence of peo­ple like Karl Rove, Dick Cheney et al., is akin to Krem­li­nol­ogy.) A post-​election change in rhetoric would prove the influ­ence of “Gen­eral Rove.”

Not so fast, Mr. President

There is a time when politi­cians should be applauded. This is one of those times. Reps. Spratt of North Car­olina and Rep. Vic Sny­der, D-​Ark., will intro­duce into the House debate on war with Iraq this alter­nate res­o­lu­tion. (It’s a PDF to be down­loaded.)
In essence it allows mil­i­tary action but only after the UNSC has been allowed to do every­thing it can, includ­ing mus­cu­lar and intru­sive inspec­tions. If the UNSC fails in its duties, the Pres­i­dent must come back to Con­gress and ask for autho­riza­tion for war against Iraq. (It actu­ally says “mil­i­tary force” instead of war, but still.)
In the case of shoot­ing, “the Pres­i­dent should endeavor to form a coali­tion of allies as broadly based as prac­ti­ca­ble to sup­port and par­tic­i­pate with United States Armed Forces, and should also seek mul­ti­lat­eral coöper­a­tion and assis­tance, specif­i­cally includ­ing Arab and Islamic coun­tries, in the post-​conflict recon­struc­tion of Iraq.“
And this:

In the event that the United Nations Secu­rity Coun­cil does not adopt a res­o­lu­tion as described in sec­tion 3, or in the event that such a res­o­lu­tion is adopted but does not sanc­tion the use of force suf­fi­cient to com­pel Iraq’s com­pli­ance, and if the Pres­i­dent deter­mines that use of the United States Armed Forces is nec­es­sary for such com­pli­ance, the Pres­i­dent should seek autho­riza­tion from Con­gress to use mil­i­tary force to com­pel such compliance.

Clear enough? In essence, come back to us, Mr. Pres­i­dent, when you’ve got some proof. Proof that Iraq is the clear and present dan­ger you say it is, and proof that the UNSC is an impo­tent orga­ni­za­tion that can’t do its job. Only then do you get the guns.
The House rules com­mit­tee has allowed this res­o­lu­tion in, so the whole House may vote on it. It likely won’t pass, but it’s a saner voice than what we’re hear­ing from the White House.
I don’t know Spratt or Sny­der or other other spon­sors of this res­o­lu­tion, but I sus­pect that I should. Thank you, gentlemen.